Cargando…
Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective
Bone grafts have traditionally come from four sources: the patients’ own tissue (autograft), tissue from a living or cadaveric human donor (allograft), animal donors (xenograft) and synthetic artificial biomaterials (ceramics, cement, polymers, and metal). However, all of these have advantages and d...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese Medical Multimedia Press Co., Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837344 http://dx.doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007 |
_version_ | 1784740992817037312 |
---|---|
author | Steijvers, Emma Ghei, Armaan Xia, Zhidao |
author_facet | Steijvers, Emma Ghei, Armaan Xia, Zhidao |
author_sort | Steijvers, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bone grafts have traditionally come from four sources: the patients’ own tissue (autograft), tissue from a living or cadaveric human donor (allograft), animal donors (xenograft) and synthetic artificial biomaterials (ceramics, cement, polymers, and metal). However, all of these have advantages and drawbacks. The most commercially successful bone grafts so far are allografts, which hold 57% of the current bone graft market; however, disease transmission and scarcity are still significant drawbacks limiting their use. Tissue-engineered grafts have great potential, in which human stem cells and synthetical biomaterials are combined to produce bone-like tissue in vitro, but this is yet to be approved for widespread clinical practice. It is hypothesised that artificial bone allografts can be mass-manufactured to replace conventional bone allografts through refined bone tissue engineering prior to decellularisation. This review article aims to review current literature on (1) conventional bone allograft preparation; (2) bone tissue engineering including the use of synthetic biomaterials as bone graft substitute scaffolds, combined with osteogenic stem cells in vitro; (3) potential artificial allograft manufacturing processes, including mass production of engineered bone tissue, osteogenic enhancement, decellularisation, sterilisation and safety assurance for regulatory approval. From these assessments, a practical route map for mass production of artificial allografts for clinical use is proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9255790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Chinese Medical Multimedia Press Co., Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92557902022-07-13 Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective Steijvers, Emma Ghei, Armaan Xia, Zhidao Biomater Transl Review Bone grafts have traditionally come from four sources: the patients’ own tissue (autograft), tissue from a living or cadaveric human donor (allograft), animal donors (xenograft) and synthetic artificial biomaterials (ceramics, cement, polymers, and metal). However, all of these have advantages and drawbacks. The most commercially successful bone grafts so far are allografts, which hold 57% of the current bone graft market; however, disease transmission and scarcity are still significant drawbacks limiting their use. Tissue-engineered grafts have great potential, in which human stem cells and synthetical biomaterials are combined to produce bone-like tissue in vitro, but this is yet to be approved for widespread clinical practice. It is hypothesised that artificial bone allografts can be mass-manufactured to replace conventional bone allografts through refined bone tissue engineering prior to decellularisation. This review article aims to review current literature on (1) conventional bone allograft preparation; (2) bone tissue engineering including the use of synthetic biomaterials as bone graft substitute scaffolds, combined with osteogenic stem cells in vitro; (3) potential artificial allograft manufacturing processes, including mass production of engineered bone tissue, osteogenic enhancement, decellularisation, sterilisation and safety assurance for regulatory approval. From these assessments, a practical route map for mass production of artificial allografts for clinical use is proposed. Chinese Medical Multimedia Press Co., Ltd 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9255790/ /pubmed/35837344 http://dx.doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Steijvers, Emma Ghei, Armaan Xia, Zhidao Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
title | Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
title_full | Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
title_fullStr | Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
title_short | Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
title_sort | manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35837344 http://dx.doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steijversemma manufacturingartificialboneallograftsaperspective AT gheiarmaan manufacturingartificialboneallograftsaperspective AT xiazhidao manufacturingartificialboneallograftsaperspective |