Cargando…

Brief Report: Implementation of a Universal Prescreening Protocol to Increase Recruitment to Lung Cancer Studies at a Veterans Affairs Cancer Center

INTRODUCTION: The oncology clinical trial recruitment process is time, labor, and resource intensive, and poor accrual rates are common. We describe the VA Connecticut Cancer Center experience of implementing a standardized, universal prescreening protocol and its impact on thoracic oncology researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiang, Jenny J., Roy, Alicia, Summers, Christine, Delvy, Monica, O’Donovan, Jessica, Christensen, John, Dwy, Christopher, Perry, Lydia, Connery, Donna, Rose, Michal G., Sheehan, Kelsey, Chao, Herta H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100357
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The oncology clinical trial recruitment process is time, labor, and resource intensive, and poor accrual rates are common. We describe the VA Connecticut Cancer Center experience of implementing a standardized, universal prescreening protocol and its impact on thoracic oncology research recruitment. METHODS: Research coordinators prescreened potentially eligible patients with confirmed or suspected cancer from multiple clinical sources and entered relevant patient and research study information into a centralized electronic database. The database provided real-time lists of potential studies for each patient. This enabled the research team to alert the patient's oncologist in advance of clinic visits and to prepare documents needed for enrollment. Clinicians could ensure sufficient time and attention in clinic to the informed consent process, therefore maximizing enrollment opportunities. Patients were also monitored on waitlists for future studies. RESULTS: From March 2017 to December 2020, a total of 1518 patients with lung nodules and suspected or confirmed lung cancers were prescreened. Of these, 379 patients were enrolled to a study, 103 patients declined participation, and 639 were monitored for future studies. Our prescreening protocol identified all new patients with lung cancer who were ultimately added to the cancer registry. We found a substantial increase in study enrollment after prescreening implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Universal prescreening was associated with improved patient enrollment to thoracic oncology studies. The protocol was integral in our VA becoming the top accruing VA site for National Cancer Institute’s National Clinical Trials Network studies for 2019 to 2021.