Cargando…

Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography–Based Radiogenomics Analysis for Predicting Prognosis in Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify prognostic imaging biomarkers and create a radiogenomics nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer (GC). MATERIAL: RNA sequencing data from 407 patients with GC and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) imaging data from 46 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Han, Wang, Yiyun, Liu, Yingqiao, Lin, Dingyi, Zhang, Cangui, Zhao, Yuyun, Chen, Li, Li, Yi, Yuan, Jianyu, Chen, Zhao, Yu, Jiang, Kong, Wentao, Chen, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.882786
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify prognostic imaging biomarkers and create a radiogenomics nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer (GC). MATERIAL: RNA sequencing data from 407 patients with GC and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) imaging data from 46 patients obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were utilized to identify radiogenomics biomarkers. A total of 392 patients with CECT images from the Nanfang Hospital database were obtained to create and validate a radiogenomics nomogram based on the biomarkers. METHODS: The prognostic imaging features that correlated with the prognostic gene modules (selected by weighted gene coexpression network analysis) were identified as imaging biomarkers. A nomogram that integrated the radiomics score and clinicopathological factors was created and validated in the Nanfang Hospital database. Nomogram discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were evaluated. RESULTS: Three prognostic imaging biomarkers were identified and had a strong correlation with four prognostic gene modules (P < 0.05, FDR < 0.05). The radiogenomics nomogram (AUC = 0.838) resulted in better performance of the survival prediction than that of the TNM staging system (AUC = 0.765, P = 0.011; Delong et al.). In addition, the radiogenomics nomogram exhibited good discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness in both the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The novel prognostic radiogenomics nomogram that was constructed achieved excellent correlation with prognosis in both the training and validation cohort of Nanfang Hospital patients with GC. It is anticipated that this work may assist in clinical preferential treatment decisions and promote the process of precision theranostics in the future.