Cargando…

Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach

Limiting or withdrawing nonbeneficial medical care is considered ethically responsible throughout most of critical care and medical ethics literature. Practically, however, setting limits to treatment is often challenging. We review the literature to identify best practices for using the definition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kopar, Piroska K., Visani, Adrienne, Squirrell, Kyler, Brown, Douglas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000706
_version_ 1784741317817925632
author Kopar, Piroska K.
Visani, Adrienne
Squirrell, Kyler
Brown, Douglas E.
author_facet Kopar, Piroska K.
Visani, Adrienne
Squirrell, Kyler
Brown, Douglas E.
author_sort Kopar, Piroska K.
collection PubMed
description Limiting or withdrawing nonbeneficial medical care is considered ethically responsible throughout most of critical care and medical ethics literature. Practically, however, setting limits to treatment is often challenging. We review the literature to identify best practices for using the definition of futility as an anchoring concept to aid the ethical practice of ICU clinicians. DATA SOURCES: Source data were obtained from a PubMed literature review. STUDY SELECTION: English language articles were chosen based on relevance to medical futility ethics, end-of-life care in the ICU, or communication and conflict mitigation strategies. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent evaluation of selected articles for recurrent content themes as relevant to our clinical case were compared among authors and based on consensus, quantitative and qualitative data from these sources were referenced directly. DATA SYNTHESIS: When life-sustaining treatment is unlikely to achieve a meaningful benefit such as symptom improvement, continued care may be discordant with the patient’s goals. Institutional and cultural norms, unconscious biases, and difficulty with navigating conflicts all influence how un(comfortable) clinicians feel in setting limits to futile care. Defining futility in light of the patient’s goals and values, focusing on outcomes rather than interventions, and being proactive in communication with families are the staples of medically meaningful critical care. Palliative measures should be framed affirmatively, and clinicians should be transparent about the limits of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have an ethical obligation not to provide futile care. To practice accordingly, we must clearly understand the nature and forms of futility. Armed with this understanding, our discussions with family and surrogates in the ICU should fundamentally comprise 1) eliciting the patient’s values and goals, 2) communicating which interventions serve those values and goals and which do not, and 3) offering only those interventions whose likely outcomes are in line with said values and goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9257305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92573052022-07-07 Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach Kopar, Piroska K. Visani, Adrienne Squirrell, Kyler Brown, Douglas E. Crit Care Explor Review Article Limiting or withdrawing nonbeneficial medical care is considered ethically responsible throughout most of critical care and medical ethics literature. Practically, however, setting limits to treatment is often challenging. We review the literature to identify best practices for using the definition of futility as an anchoring concept to aid the ethical practice of ICU clinicians. DATA SOURCES: Source data were obtained from a PubMed literature review. STUDY SELECTION: English language articles were chosen based on relevance to medical futility ethics, end-of-life care in the ICU, or communication and conflict mitigation strategies. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent evaluation of selected articles for recurrent content themes as relevant to our clinical case were compared among authors and based on consensus, quantitative and qualitative data from these sources were referenced directly. DATA SYNTHESIS: When life-sustaining treatment is unlikely to achieve a meaningful benefit such as symptom improvement, continued care may be discordant with the patient’s goals. Institutional and cultural norms, unconscious biases, and difficulty with navigating conflicts all influence how un(comfortable) clinicians feel in setting limits to futile care. Defining futility in light of the patient’s goals and values, focusing on outcomes rather than interventions, and being proactive in communication with families are the staples of medically meaningful critical care. Palliative measures should be framed affirmatively, and clinicians should be transparent about the limits of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have an ethical obligation not to provide futile care. To practice accordingly, we must clearly understand the nature and forms of futility. Armed with this understanding, our discussions with family and surrogates in the ICU should fundamentally comprise 1) eliciting the patient’s values and goals, 2) communicating which interventions serve those values and goals and which do not, and 3) offering only those interventions whose likely outcomes are in line with said values and goals. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9257305/ /pubmed/35815180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000706 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kopar, Piroska K.
Visani, Adrienne
Squirrell, Kyler
Brown, Douglas E.
Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach
title Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach
title_full Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach
title_fullStr Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach
title_full_unstemmed Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach
title_short Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach
title_sort addressing futility: a practical approach
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000706
work_keys_str_mv AT koparpiroskak addressingfutilityapracticalapproach
AT visaniadrienne addressingfutilityapracticalapproach
AT squirrellkyler addressingfutilityapracticalapproach
AT browndouglase addressingfutilityapracticalapproach