Relevance of Non-Bridging Therapy with Heparin during Temporary Interruption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

Objectives: To evaluate the relevance of non-bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin during the temporary, pre-procedural interruption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 142 patients with cancer and VTE who required temporary interruption of DOACs before invasive procedures. Data, including rates of VTE recurrence, non-major bleeding, and major bleeding, were compared between patients who received or not received alternative therapy with unfractionated heparin during interruption. Results: Sixty-eight patients were prescribed heparin, while 74 were not. There were no differences in age, body mass index, white blood cell count, hemoglobin level, or platelet count between the groups. VTE recurrence was observed in four (6%) and one (1%) patient in the heparin bridging and non-bridging groups, respectively (risk ratio [RR]: 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–38.0, p=0.19). Non-major bleeding occurred in three (4%) and two (3%) patients in the bridging and non-bridging groups (RR: 1.6, 95%CI: 0.28–9.48, p=0.67), while major bleeding occurred in 0 (0%) and three patients (4%) (p=0.25), respectively. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the relevance of non-bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin for reducing VTE risk during DOAC interruption in patients with cancer.