Cargando…
Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity
BACKGROUND: Despite the established relation between energy restriction (ER) and metabolic health, the most beneficial nutrient composition of a weight-loss diet is still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the additional effects of nutrient quality on top of ER. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35102369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac025 |
_version_ | 1784741352977727488 |
---|---|
author | Schutte, Sophie Esser, Diederik Siebelink, Els Michielsen, Charlotte J R Daanje, Monique Matualatupauw, Juri C Boshuizen, Hendriek C Mensink, Marco Afman, Lydia A |
author_facet | Schutte, Sophie Esser, Diederik Siebelink, Els Michielsen, Charlotte J R Daanje, Monique Matualatupauw, Juri C Boshuizen, Hendriek C Mensink, Marco Afman, Lydia A |
author_sort | Schutte, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the established relation between energy restriction (ER) and metabolic health, the most beneficial nutrient composition of a weight-loss diet is still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the additional effects of nutrient quality on top of ER. METHODS: A parallel-designed, 12-week 25% ER dietary intervention study was conducted (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02194504). Participants aged 40–70 years with abdominal obesity were randomized over 3 groups: a 25% ER high-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); a 25% ER low-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); or a habitual diet (n = 30). Both ER diets were nutritionally adequate, and the high-nutrient-quality ER diet was enriched in MUFAs, n-3 PUFAs, fiber, and plant protein and reduced in fructose. Before and after the intervention, intrahepatic lipids, body fat distribution, fasting and postprandial responses to a mixed-meal shake challenge test of cardiometabolic risk factors, lipoproteins, vascular measurements, and adipose tissue transcriptome were assessed. RESULTS: The high-nutrient-quality ER diet (−8.4 ± 3.2) induced 2.1 kg more weight loss (P = 0.007) than the low-nutrient-quality ER diet (−6.3 ± 3.9), reduced fasting serum total cholesterol (P = 0.014) and plasma triglycerides (P < 0.001), promoted an antiatherogenic lipoprotein profile, and induced a more pronounced decrease in adipose tissue gene expression of energy metabolism pathways than the low-quality ER diet. Explorative analyses showed that the difference in weight loss between the two ER diets was specifically present in insulin-sensitive subjects (HOMA-IR ≤ 2.5), in whom the high-nutrient-quality diet induced 3.9 kg more weight loss than the low-nutrient-quality diet. CONCLUSIONS: A high-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet is more beneficial for cardiometabolic health than a low-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet. Overweight, insulin-sensitive subjects may benefit more from a high- than a low-nutrient-quality ER diet with respect to weight loss, due to potential attenuation of glucose-induced lipid synthesis in adipose tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9257474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92574742022-07-07 Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity Schutte, Sophie Esser, Diederik Siebelink, Els Michielsen, Charlotte J R Daanje, Monique Matualatupauw, Juri C Boshuizen, Hendriek C Mensink, Marco Afman, Lydia A Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Despite the established relation between energy restriction (ER) and metabolic health, the most beneficial nutrient composition of a weight-loss diet is still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the additional effects of nutrient quality on top of ER. METHODS: A parallel-designed, 12-week 25% ER dietary intervention study was conducted (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02194504). Participants aged 40–70 years with abdominal obesity were randomized over 3 groups: a 25% ER high-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); a 25% ER low-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); or a habitual diet (n = 30). Both ER diets were nutritionally adequate, and the high-nutrient-quality ER diet was enriched in MUFAs, n-3 PUFAs, fiber, and plant protein and reduced in fructose. Before and after the intervention, intrahepatic lipids, body fat distribution, fasting and postprandial responses to a mixed-meal shake challenge test of cardiometabolic risk factors, lipoproteins, vascular measurements, and adipose tissue transcriptome were assessed. RESULTS: The high-nutrient-quality ER diet (−8.4 ± 3.2) induced 2.1 kg more weight loss (P = 0.007) than the low-nutrient-quality ER diet (−6.3 ± 3.9), reduced fasting serum total cholesterol (P = 0.014) and plasma triglycerides (P < 0.001), promoted an antiatherogenic lipoprotein profile, and induced a more pronounced decrease in adipose tissue gene expression of energy metabolism pathways than the low-quality ER diet. Explorative analyses showed that the difference in weight loss between the two ER diets was specifically present in insulin-sensitive subjects (HOMA-IR ≤ 2.5), in whom the high-nutrient-quality diet induced 3.9 kg more weight loss than the low-nutrient-quality diet. CONCLUSIONS: A high-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet is more beneficial for cardiometabolic health than a low-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet. Overweight, insulin-sensitive subjects may benefit more from a high- than a low-nutrient-quality ER diet with respect to weight loss, due to potential attenuation of glucose-induced lipid synthesis in adipose tissue. Oxford University Press 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9257474/ /pubmed/35102369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac025 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Communications Schutte, Sophie Esser, Diederik Siebelink, Els Michielsen, Charlotte J R Daanje, Monique Matualatupauw, Juri C Boshuizen, Hendriek C Mensink, Marco Afman, Lydia A Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
title | Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
title_full | Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
title_fullStr | Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
title_short | Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
title_sort | diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity |
topic | Original Research Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35102369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schuttesophie divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT esserdiederik divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT siebelinkels divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT michielsencharlottejr divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT daanjemonique divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT matualatupauwjuric divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT boshuizenhendriekc divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT mensinkmarco divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT afmanlydiaa divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity AT divergingmetaboliceffectsof2energyrestricteddietsdifferinginnutrientqualitya12weekrandomizedcontrolledtrialinsubjectswithabdominalobesity |