Cargando…

Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examined and synthesized peer-reviewed research studies that reported the process of integrating social determinants of health (SDOH) or social needs screening into electronic health records (EHRs) and the intervention effects in the United States. METHODS: Followin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Alice F., Chen, Zhuo, Wang, Yang, Campbell, Jennifer A., Xue, Qian-Li, Williams, Michelle Y., Weinhardt, Lance S., Egede, Leonard E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2022.0010
_version_ 1784741360686858240
author Yan, Alice F.
Chen, Zhuo
Wang, Yang
Campbell, Jennifer A.
Xue, Qian-Li
Williams, Michelle Y.
Weinhardt, Lance S.
Egede, Leonard E.
author_facet Yan, Alice F.
Chen, Zhuo
Wang, Yang
Campbell, Jennifer A.
Xue, Qian-Li
Williams, Michelle Y.
Weinhardt, Lance S.
Egede, Leonard E.
author_sort Yan, Alice F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examined and synthesized peer-reviewed research studies that reported the process of integrating social determinants of health (SDOH) or social needs screening into electronic health records (EHRs) and the intervention effects in the United States. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, a systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials was performed. English language peer-reviewed studies that reported the process of integrating SDOH or social needs screening into EHRs within the U.S. health systems and published between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. The review focused on process measures, social needs changes, health outcomes, and health care cost and utilization. RESULTS: In total, 28 studies were included, and half were randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies targeted multiple SDOH domains. The interventions vary by the levels of intensity of their approaches and heterogeneities in outcome measures. Most studies (82%, n=23) reported the findings related to the process measures, and nearly half (43%, n=12) reported outcomes related to social needs. By contrast, only 39% (n=11) and 32% (n=9) of the studies reported health outcomes and impact on health care cost and utilization, respectively. Findings on patients' social needs change demonstrated improved access to resources. However, findings were mixed on intervention effects on health and health care cost and utilization. We also identified gaps in implementation challenges to be overcome. CONCLUSION: Our review supports the current policy efforts to increase U.S. health systems' investment toward directly addressing SDOH. While effective interventions can be more complex or resource intensive than an online referral, health care organizations hoping to achieve health equity and improve population health must commit the effort and investment required to achieve this goal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9257553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92575532022-07-06 Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review Yan, Alice F. Chen, Zhuo Wang, Yang Campbell, Jennifer A. Xue, Qian-Li Williams, Michelle Y. Weinhardt, Lance S. Egede, Leonard E. Health Equity Review Article OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examined and synthesized peer-reviewed research studies that reported the process of integrating social determinants of health (SDOH) or social needs screening into electronic health records (EHRs) and the intervention effects in the United States. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, a systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials was performed. English language peer-reviewed studies that reported the process of integrating SDOH or social needs screening into EHRs within the U.S. health systems and published between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. The review focused on process measures, social needs changes, health outcomes, and health care cost and utilization. RESULTS: In total, 28 studies were included, and half were randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies targeted multiple SDOH domains. The interventions vary by the levels of intensity of their approaches and heterogeneities in outcome measures. Most studies (82%, n=23) reported the findings related to the process measures, and nearly half (43%, n=12) reported outcomes related to social needs. By contrast, only 39% (n=11) and 32% (n=9) of the studies reported health outcomes and impact on health care cost and utilization, respectively. Findings on patients' social needs change demonstrated improved access to resources. However, findings were mixed on intervention effects on health and health care cost and utilization. We also identified gaps in implementation challenges to be overcome. CONCLUSION: Our review supports the current policy efforts to increase U.S. health systems' investment toward directly addressing SDOH. While effective interventions can be more complex or resource intensive than an online referral, health care organizations hoping to achieve health equity and improve population health must commit the effort and investment required to achieve this goal. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9257553/ /pubmed/35801145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2022.0010 Text en © Alice F. Yan et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yan, Alice F.
Chen, Zhuo
Wang, Yang
Campbell, Jennifer A.
Xue, Qian-Li
Williams, Michelle Y.
Weinhardt, Lance S.
Egede, Leonard E.
Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_full Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_short Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of social needs screening and interventions in clinical settings on utilization, cost, and clinical outcomes: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2022.0010
work_keys_str_mv AT yanalicef effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT chenzhuo effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT wangyang effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT campbelljennifera effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT xueqianli effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT williamsmichelley effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT weinhardtlances effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview
AT egedeleonarde effectivenessofsocialneedsscreeningandinterventionsinclinicalsettingsonutilizationcostandclinicaloutcomesasystematicreview