Cargando…

From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process

Electronic platforms provide an opportunity to improve the informed consent (IC) process by permitting elements shown to increase research participant understanding and satisfaction, such as graphics, self-pacing, meaningful engagement, and access to additional information on demand. However, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cobb, Nichelle L., Edwards, Dorothy F., Chin, Erin M., Lah, James J., Goldstein, Felicia C., Manzanares, Cecilia M., Suver, Christine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.379
_version_ 1784741409282064384
author Cobb, Nichelle L.
Edwards, Dorothy F.
Chin, Erin M.
Lah, James J.
Goldstein, Felicia C.
Manzanares, Cecilia M.
Suver, Christine M.
author_facet Cobb, Nichelle L.
Edwards, Dorothy F.
Chin, Erin M.
Lah, James J.
Goldstein, Felicia C.
Manzanares, Cecilia M.
Suver, Christine M.
author_sort Cobb, Nichelle L.
collection PubMed
description Electronic platforms provide an opportunity to improve the informed consent (IC) process by permitting elements shown to increase research participant understanding and satisfaction, such as graphics, self-pacing, meaningful engagement, and access to additional information on demand. However, including these elements can pose operational and regulatory challenges for study teams and institutional review boards (IRBs) responsible for the ethical conduct and oversight of research. We examined the experience of two study teams at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers who chose to move from a paper-based IC process to an electronic informed consent (eIC) process to highlight some of these complexities and explore how IRBs and study teams can navigate them. Here, we identify the key regulations that should be considered when developing and using an eIC process as well as some of the operational considerations eIC presents related to IRB review and how they can be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9257776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92577762022-07-13 From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process Cobb, Nichelle L. Edwards, Dorothy F. Chin, Erin M. Lah, James J. Goldstein, Felicia C. Manzanares, Cecilia M. Suver, Christine M. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications Electronic platforms provide an opportunity to improve the informed consent (IC) process by permitting elements shown to increase research participant understanding and satisfaction, such as graphics, self-pacing, meaningful engagement, and access to additional information on demand. However, including these elements can pose operational and regulatory challenges for study teams and institutional review boards (IRBs) responsible for the ethical conduct and oversight of research. We examined the experience of two study teams at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers who chose to move from a paper-based IC process to an electronic informed consent (eIC) process to highlight some of these complexities and explore how IRBs and study teams can navigate them. Here, we identify the key regulations that should be considered when developing and using an eIC process as well as some of the operational considerations eIC presents related to IRB review and how they can be addressed. Cambridge University Press 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9257776/ /pubmed/35836789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.379 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Communications
Cobb, Nichelle L.
Edwards, Dorothy F.
Chin, Erin M.
Lah, James J.
Goldstein, Felicia C.
Manzanares, Cecilia M.
Suver, Christine M.
From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
title From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
title_full From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
title_fullStr From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
title_full_unstemmed From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
title_short From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
title_sort from paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
topic Special Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.379
work_keys_str_mv AT cobbnichellel frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess
AT edwardsdorothyf frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess
AT chinerinm frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess
AT lahjamesj frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess
AT goldsteinfeliciac frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess
AT manzanaresceciliam frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess
AT suverchristinem frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess