Cargando…
From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process
Electronic platforms provide an opportunity to improve the informed consent (IC) process by permitting elements shown to increase research participant understanding and satisfaction, such as graphics, self-pacing, meaningful engagement, and access to additional information on demand. However, includ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.379 |
_version_ | 1784741409282064384 |
---|---|
author | Cobb, Nichelle L. Edwards, Dorothy F. Chin, Erin M. Lah, James J. Goldstein, Felicia C. Manzanares, Cecilia M. Suver, Christine M. |
author_facet | Cobb, Nichelle L. Edwards, Dorothy F. Chin, Erin M. Lah, James J. Goldstein, Felicia C. Manzanares, Cecilia M. Suver, Christine M. |
author_sort | Cobb, Nichelle L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electronic platforms provide an opportunity to improve the informed consent (IC) process by permitting elements shown to increase research participant understanding and satisfaction, such as graphics, self-pacing, meaningful engagement, and access to additional information on demand. However, including these elements can pose operational and regulatory challenges for study teams and institutional review boards (IRBs) responsible for the ethical conduct and oversight of research. We examined the experience of two study teams at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers who chose to move from a paper-based IC process to an electronic informed consent (eIC) process to highlight some of these complexities and explore how IRBs and study teams can navigate them. Here, we identify the key regulations that should be considered when developing and using an eIC process as well as some of the operational considerations eIC presents related to IRB review and how they can be addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9257776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92577762022-07-13 From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process Cobb, Nichelle L. Edwards, Dorothy F. Chin, Erin M. Lah, James J. Goldstein, Felicia C. Manzanares, Cecilia M. Suver, Christine M. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications Electronic platforms provide an opportunity to improve the informed consent (IC) process by permitting elements shown to increase research participant understanding and satisfaction, such as graphics, self-pacing, meaningful engagement, and access to additional information on demand. However, including these elements can pose operational and regulatory challenges for study teams and institutional review boards (IRBs) responsible for the ethical conduct and oversight of research. We examined the experience of two study teams at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers who chose to move from a paper-based IC process to an electronic informed consent (eIC) process to highlight some of these complexities and explore how IRBs and study teams can navigate them. Here, we identify the key regulations that should be considered when developing and using an eIC process as well as some of the operational considerations eIC presents related to IRB review and how they can be addressed. Cambridge University Press 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9257776/ /pubmed/35836789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.379 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Communications Cobb, Nichelle L. Edwards, Dorothy F. Chin, Erin M. Lah, James J. Goldstein, Felicia C. Manzanares, Cecilia M. Suver, Christine M. From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
title | From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
title_full | From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
title_fullStr | From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
title_full_unstemmed | From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
title_short | From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
title_sort | from paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process |
topic | Special Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cobbnichellel frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess AT edwardsdorothyf frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess AT chinerinm frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess AT lahjamesj frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess AT goldsteinfeliciac frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess AT manzanaresceciliam frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess AT suverchristinem frompapertoscreenregulatoryandoperationalconsiderationsformodernizingtheinformedconsentprocess |