Cargando…

EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) have recently been reported with good outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA in the treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Rajat, Mohammed, Abdul, Singh, Amandeep, Harnegie, Mary P., Rustagi, Tarun, Stevens, Tyler, Chahal, Prabhleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313416
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00044
_version_ 1784741446234931200
author Garg, Rajat
Mohammed, Abdul
Singh, Amandeep
Harnegie, Mary P.
Rustagi, Tarun
Stevens, Tyler
Chahal, Prabhleen
author_facet Garg, Rajat
Mohammed, Abdul
Singh, Amandeep
Harnegie, Mary P.
Rustagi, Tarun
Stevens, Tyler
Chahal, Prabhleen
author_sort Garg, Rajat
collection PubMed
description EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) have recently been reported with good outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA in the treatment of PNETs. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (through October 2020) was performed to identify studies that reported outcomes of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA of PNETs. Outcomes assessed included clinical success, technical success, and adverse events (AEs). A total of 181 (100 EUS-RFA, 81 EUS-EA) patients (60.7 ± 9.2 years) with 204 (113 EUS-RFA, 91 EUS-EA) PNETs (mean size 15.1 ± 4.7 mm) were included from 20 studies. There was no significant difference in the rates of technical success (94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.5–97.3, I(2) = 0] vs. 96.7% [95% CI: 90.8–98.8, I(2) = 0]; P = 0.42), clinical success (85.2% (95% CI: 75.9–91.4, I(2) = 0) vs. 82.2% [95% CI: 68.2–90.8, I(2) = 10.1]; P = 0.65), and AEs (14.1% [95% CI: 7.1–26.3, I(2) = 0] vs. 11.5% [95% CI: 4.7–25.4, I(2) = 63.5]; P = 0.7) between EUS-RFA and EUS-EA, respectively. The most common AE was pancreatitis with the rate of 7.8% and 7.6% (P = 0.95) for EUS-RFA and EUS-EA, respectively. On meta-regression, the location of PNETs in head/neck of pancreas (P = 0.03) was a positive predictor of clinical success for EUS-RFA. EUS-RFA and EUS-EA have similar effectiveness and safety for PNETs ablation. Head/neck location of PNETs was a positive predictor for clinical success after EUS-RFA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9258014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92580142022-07-07 EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Garg, Rajat Mohammed, Abdul Singh, Amandeep Harnegie, Mary P. Rustagi, Tarun Stevens, Tyler Chahal, Prabhleen Endosc Ultrasound Review Article EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) have recently been reported with good outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA in the treatment of PNETs. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (through October 2020) was performed to identify studies that reported outcomes of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA of PNETs. Outcomes assessed included clinical success, technical success, and adverse events (AEs). A total of 181 (100 EUS-RFA, 81 EUS-EA) patients (60.7 ± 9.2 years) with 204 (113 EUS-RFA, 91 EUS-EA) PNETs (mean size 15.1 ± 4.7 mm) were included from 20 studies. There was no significant difference in the rates of technical success (94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.5–97.3, I(2) = 0] vs. 96.7% [95% CI: 90.8–98.8, I(2) = 0]; P = 0.42), clinical success (85.2% (95% CI: 75.9–91.4, I(2) = 0) vs. 82.2% [95% CI: 68.2–90.8, I(2) = 10.1]; P = 0.65), and AEs (14.1% [95% CI: 7.1–26.3, I(2) = 0] vs. 11.5% [95% CI: 4.7–25.4, I(2) = 63.5]; P = 0.7) between EUS-RFA and EUS-EA, respectively. The most common AE was pancreatitis with the rate of 7.8% and 7.6% (P = 0.95) for EUS-RFA and EUS-EA, respectively. On meta-regression, the location of PNETs in head/neck of pancreas (P = 0.03) was a positive predictor of clinical success for EUS-RFA. EUS-RFA and EUS-EA have similar effectiveness and safety for PNETs ablation. Head/neck location of PNETs was a positive predictor for clinical success after EUS-RFA. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9258014/ /pubmed/35313416 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00044 Text en Copyright: © 2022 SPRING MEDIA PUBLISHING CO. LTD https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Garg, Rajat
Mohammed, Abdul
Singh, Amandeep
Harnegie, Mary P.
Rustagi, Tarun
Stevens, Tyler
Chahal, Prabhleen
EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short EUS-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort eus-guided radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313416
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00044
work_keys_str_mv AT gargrajat eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammedabdul eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhamandeep eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harnegiemaryp eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rustagitarun eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stevenstyler eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chahalprabhleen eusguidedradiofrequencyandethanolablationforpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis