Cargando…

Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review

EUS is an important diagnostic tool in pancreatic lesions. Performance of single-center and/or single study artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of EUS-images of pancreatic lesions has been reported. The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the pooled rates of diagnostic performance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Babu P., Facciorusso, Antonio, Khan, Shahab R., Madhu, Deepak, Kassab, Lena L., Ponnada, Suresh, Chandan, Saurabh, Crino, Stefano F., Kochhar, Gursimran S., Adler, Douglas G., Wallace, Michael B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313417
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00063
_version_ 1784741447526776832
author Mohan, Babu P.
Facciorusso, Antonio
Khan, Shahab R.
Madhu, Deepak
Kassab, Lena L.
Ponnada, Suresh
Chandan, Saurabh
Crino, Stefano F.
Kochhar, Gursimran S.
Adler, Douglas G.
Wallace, Michael B.
author_facet Mohan, Babu P.
Facciorusso, Antonio
Khan, Shahab R.
Madhu, Deepak
Kassab, Lena L.
Ponnada, Suresh
Chandan, Saurabh
Crino, Stefano F.
Kochhar, Gursimran S.
Adler, Douglas G.
Wallace, Michael B.
author_sort Mohan, Babu P.
collection PubMed
description EUS is an important diagnostic tool in pancreatic lesions. Performance of single-center and/or single study artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of EUS-images of pancreatic lesions has been reported. The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the pooled rates of diagnostic performance of AI in EUS image analysis of pancreas using rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Multiple databases were searched (from inception to December 2020) and studies that reported on the performance of AI in EUS analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were selected. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates. In cases where multiple 2 × 2 contingency tables were provided for different thresholds, we assumed the data tables as independent from each other. Heterogeneity was assessed by I(2)% and 95% prediction intervals. Eleven studies were analyzed. The pooled overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 86% (95% confidence interval [82.8–88.6]), 90.4% (88.1–92.3), 84% (79.3–87.8), 90.2% (87.4–92.3) and 89.8% (86–92.7), respectively. On subgroup analysis, the corresponding pooled parameters in studies that used neural networks were 85.5% (80–89.8), 91.8% (87.8–94.6), 84.6% (73–91.7), 87.4% (82–91.3), and 91.4% (83.7–95.6)], respectively. Based on our meta-analysis, AI seems to perform well in the EUS-image analysis of pancreatic lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9258019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92580192022-07-07 Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review Mohan, Babu P. Facciorusso, Antonio Khan, Shahab R. Madhu, Deepak Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Chandan, Saurabh Crino, Stefano F. Kochhar, Gursimran S. Adler, Douglas G. Wallace, Michael B. Endosc Ultrasound Review Article EUS is an important diagnostic tool in pancreatic lesions. Performance of single-center and/or single study artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of EUS-images of pancreatic lesions has been reported. The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the pooled rates of diagnostic performance of AI in EUS image analysis of pancreas using rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Multiple databases were searched (from inception to December 2020) and studies that reported on the performance of AI in EUS analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were selected. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates. In cases where multiple 2 × 2 contingency tables were provided for different thresholds, we assumed the data tables as independent from each other. Heterogeneity was assessed by I(2)% and 95% prediction intervals. Eleven studies were analyzed. The pooled overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 86% (95% confidence interval [82.8–88.6]), 90.4% (88.1–92.3), 84% (79.3–87.8), 90.2% (87.4–92.3) and 89.8% (86–92.7), respectively. On subgroup analysis, the corresponding pooled parameters in studies that used neural networks were 85.5% (80–89.8), 91.8% (87.8–94.6), 84.6% (73–91.7), 87.4% (82–91.3), and 91.4% (83.7–95.6)], respectively. Based on our meta-analysis, AI seems to perform well in the EUS-image analysis of pancreatic lesions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9258019/ /pubmed/35313417 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00063 Text en Copyright: © 2022 SPRING MEDIA PUBLISHING CO. LTD https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mohan, Babu P.
Facciorusso, Antonio
Khan, Shahab R.
Madhu, Deepak
Kassab, Lena L.
Ponnada, Suresh
Chandan, Saurabh
Crino, Stefano F.
Kochhar, Gursimran S.
Adler, Douglas G.
Wallace, Michael B.
Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
title Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
title_full Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
title_fullStr Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
title_full_unstemmed Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
title_short Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
title_sort pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in eus image analysis of the pancreas: a descriptive quantitative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313417
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00063
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanbabup pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT facciorussoantonio pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT khanshahabr pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT madhudeepak pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT kassablenal pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT ponnadasuresh pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT chandansaurabh pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT crinostefanof pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT kochhargursimrans pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT adlerdouglasg pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview
AT wallacemichaelb pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview