Cargando…
Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review
EUS is an important diagnostic tool in pancreatic lesions. Performance of single-center and/or single study artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of EUS-images of pancreatic lesions has been reported. The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the pooled rates of diagnostic performance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313417 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00063 |
_version_ | 1784741447526776832 |
---|---|
author | Mohan, Babu P. Facciorusso, Antonio Khan, Shahab R. Madhu, Deepak Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Chandan, Saurabh Crino, Stefano F. Kochhar, Gursimran S. Adler, Douglas G. Wallace, Michael B. |
author_facet | Mohan, Babu P. Facciorusso, Antonio Khan, Shahab R. Madhu, Deepak Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Chandan, Saurabh Crino, Stefano F. Kochhar, Gursimran S. Adler, Douglas G. Wallace, Michael B. |
author_sort | Mohan, Babu P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | EUS is an important diagnostic tool in pancreatic lesions. Performance of single-center and/or single study artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of EUS-images of pancreatic lesions has been reported. The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the pooled rates of diagnostic performance of AI in EUS image analysis of pancreas using rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Multiple databases were searched (from inception to December 2020) and studies that reported on the performance of AI in EUS analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were selected. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates. In cases where multiple 2 × 2 contingency tables were provided for different thresholds, we assumed the data tables as independent from each other. Heterogeneity was assessed by I(2)% and 95% prediction intervals. Eleven studies were analyzed. The pooled overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 86% (95% confidence interval [82.8–88.6]), 90.4% (88.1–92.3), 84% (79.3–87.8), 90.2% (87.4–92.3) and 89.8% (86–92.7), respectively. On subgroup analysis, the corresponding pooled parameters in studies that used neural networks were 85.5% (80–89.8), 91.8% (87.8–94.6), 84.6% (73–91.7), 87.4% (82–91.3), and 91.4% (83.7–95.6)], respectively. Based on our meta-analysis, AI seems to perform well in the EUS-image analysis of pancreatic lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9258019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92580192022-07-07 Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review Mohan, Babu P. Facciorusso, Antonio Khan, Shahab R. Madhu, Deepak Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Chandan, Saurabh Crino, Stefano F. Kochhar, Gursimran S. Adler, Douglas G. Wallace, Michael B. Endosc Ultrasound Review Article EUS is an important diagnostic tool in pancreatic lesions. Performance of single-center and/or single study artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of EUS-images of pancreatic lesions has been reported. The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the pooled rates of diagnostic performance of AI in EUS image analysis of pancreas using rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Multiple databases were searched (from inception to December 2020) and studies that reported on the performance of AI in EUS analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were selected. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates. In cases where multiple 2 × 2 contingency tables were provided for different thresholds, we assumed the data tables as independent from each other. Heterogeneity was assessed by I(2)% and 95% prediction intervals. Eleven studies were analyzed. The pooled overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 86% (95% confidence interval [82.8–88.6]), 90.4% (88.1–92.3), 84% (79.3–87.8), 90.2% (87.4–92.3) and 89.8% (86–92.7), respectively. On subgroup analysis, the corresponding pooled parameters in studies that used neural networks were 85.5% (80–89.8), 91.8% (87.8–94.6), 84.6% (73–91.7), 87.4% (82–91.3), and 91.4% (83.7–95.6)], respectively. Based on our meta-analysis, AI seems to perform well in the EUS-image analysis of pancreatic lesions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9258019/ /pubmed/35313417 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00063 Text en Copyright: © 2022 SPRING MEDIA PUBLISHING CO. LTD https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mohan, Babu P. Facciorusso, Antonio Khan, Shahab R. Madhu, Deepak Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Chandan, Saurabh Crino, Stefano F. Kochhar, Gursimran S. Adler, Douglas G. Wallace, Michael B. Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review |
title | Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review |
title_full | Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review |
title_fullStr | Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review |
title_short | Pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in EUS image analysis of the pancreas: A descriptive quantitative review |
title_sort | pooled diagnostic parameters of artificial intelligence in eus image analysis of the pancreas: a descriptive quantitative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313417 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohanbabup pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT facciorussoantonio pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT khanshahabr pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT madhudeepak pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT kassablenal pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT ponnadasuresh pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT chandansaurabh pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT crinostefanof pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT kochhargursimrans pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT adlerdouglasg pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview AT wallacemichaelb pooleddiagnosticparametersofartificialintelligenceineusimageanalysisofthepancreasadescriptivequantitativereview |