Cargando…
End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both phy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7 |
_version_ | 1784741469642293248 |
---|---|
author | Quintens, Charlotte Peetermans, Willy E. Van der Linden, Lorenz Declercq, Peter Van den Bosch, Bart Spriet, Isabel |
author_facet | Quintens, Charlotte Peetermans, Willy E. Van der Linden, Lorenz Declercq, Peter Van den Bosch, Bart Spriet, Isabel |
author_sort | Quintens, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians’ and pharmacists’ feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service. METHODS: An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered. RESULTS: A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts. CONCLUSIONS: The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9258110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92581102022-07-07 End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service Quintens, Charlotte Peetermans, Willy E. Van der Linden, Lorenz Declercq, Peter Van den Bosch, Bart Spriet, Isabel BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians’ and pharmacists’ feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service. METHODS: An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered. RESULTS: A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts. CONCLUSIONS: The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9258110/ /pubmed/35790983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Quintens, Charlotte Peetermans, Willy E. Van der Linden, Lorenz Declercq, Peter Van den Bosch, Bart Spriet, Isabel End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service |
title | End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service |
title_full | End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service |
title_fullStr | End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service |
title_full_unstemmed | End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service |
title_short | End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service |
title_sort | end-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based check of medication appropriateness service |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quintenscharlotte endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice AT peetermanswillye endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice AT vanderlindenlorenz endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice AT declercqpeter endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice AT vandenboschbart endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice AT sprietisabel endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice |