Cargando…

End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service

BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both phy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintens, Charlotte, Peetermans, Willy E., Van der Linden, Lorenz, Declercq, Peter, Van den Bosch, Bart, Spriet, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7
_version_ 1784741469642293248
author Quintens, Charlotte
Peetermans, Willy E.
Van der Linden, Lorenz
Declercq, Peter
Van den Bosch, Bart
Spriet, Isabel
author_facet Quintens, Charlotte
Peetermans, Willy E.
Van der Linden, Lorenz
Declercq, Peter
Van den Bosch, Bart
Spriet, Isabel
author_sort Quintens, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians’ and pharmacists’ feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service. METHODS: An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered. RESULTS: A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts. CONCLUSIONS: The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9258110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92581102022-07-07 End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service Quintens, Charlotte Peetermans, Willy E. Van der Linden, Lorenz Declercq, Peter Van den Bosch, Bart Spriet, Isabel BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians’ and pharmacists’ feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service. METHODS: An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered. RESULTS: A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts. CONCLUSIONS: The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9258110/ /pubmed/35790983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Quintens, Charlotte
Peetermans, Willy E.
Van der Linden, Lorenz
Declercq, Peter
Van den Bosch, Bart
Spriet, Isabel
End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
title End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
title_full End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
title_fullStr End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
title_full_unstemmed End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
title_short End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service
title_sort end-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based check of medication appropriateness service
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7
work_keys_str_mv AT quintenscharlotte endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice
AT peetermanswillye endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice
AT vanderlindenlorenz endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice
AT declercqpeter endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice
AT vandenboschbart endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice
AT sprietisabel endusersfeedbackandperceptionsassociatedwiththeimplementationofaclinicalrulebasedcheckofmedicationappropriatenessservice