Evaluating the power and limitations of genome-wide association studies in Caenorhabditis elegans

Quantitative genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans seeks to identify naturally segregating genetic variants that underlie complex traits. Genome-wide association studies scan the genome for individual genetic variants that are significantly correlated with phenotypic variation in a population, or quantitative trait loci. Genome-wide association studies are a popular choice for quantitative genetic analyses because the quantitative trait loci that are discovered segregate in natural populations. Despite numerous successful mapping experiments, the empirical performance of genome-wide association study has not, to date, been formally evaluated in C. elegans. We developed an open-source genome-wide association study pipeline called NemaScan and used a simulation-based approach to provide benchmarks of mapping performance in collections of wild C. elegans strains. Simulated trait heritability and complexity determined the spectrum of quantitative trait loci detected by genome-wide association studies. Power to detect smaller-effect quantitative trait loci increased with the number of strains sampled from the C. elegans Natural Diversity Resource. Population structure was a major driver of variation in mapping performance, with populations shaped by recent selection exhibiting significantly lower false discovery rates than populations composed of more divergent strains. We also recapitulated previous genome-wide association studies of experimentally validated quantitative trait variants. Our simulation-based evaluation of performance provides the community with critical context to pursue quantitative genetic studies using the C. elegans Natural Diversity Resource to elucidate the genetic basis of complex traits in C. elegans natural populations.