Cargando…
Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery
Co-production is now the gold standard in policymaking, characterised by national and international actors with different types of knowledge working together to contribute to a collaborative decision-making process. The benefits of co-production in policymaking can include improved knowledge generat...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35818449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00551-z |
_version_ | 1784741617695981568 |
---|---|
author | Goulart, Pedro Falanga, Roberto |
author_facet | Goulart, Pedro Falanga, Roberto |
author_sort | Goulart, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Co-production is now the gold standard in policymaking, characterised by national and international actors with different types of knowledge working together to contribute to a collaborative decision-making process. The benefits of co-production in policymaking can include improved knowledge generation that merges practice-centred, political and technical knowledge and incorporates local knowledges to provide complementary information and increase ownership over policymaking processes. Nevertheless, it can also present pitfalls such as multiple and diverging interests, incomplete and asymmetric information, and resource asymmetries and elite capture as highlighted by Bender in (Eur J Dev Res, 2022). By reviewing a case in the European periphery, we document and illustrate situations of collaboration and conflict, benefits and pitfalls resulting from policymaking co-production, throughout recent Portuguese history and in present-day participatory budget initiatives. From competing national actors to influences from the Global North and Global South, the final outcome reflects a learning process in collaboration but also underlying power struggles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9258755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92587552022-07-07 Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery Goulart, Pedro Falanga, Roberto Eur J Dev Res Commentary Co-production is now the gold standard in policymaking, characterised by national and international actors with different types of knowledge working together to contribute to a collaborative decision-making process. The benefits of co-production in policymaking can include improved knowledge generation that merges practice-centred, political and technical knowledge and incorporates local knowledges to provide complementary information and increase ownership over policymaking processes. Nevertheless, it can also present pitfalls such as multiple and diverging interests, incomplete and asymmetric information, and resource asymmetries and elite capture as highlighted by Bender in (Eur J Dev Res, 2022). By reviewing a case in the European periphery, we document and illustrate situations of collaboration and conflict, benefits and pitfalls resulting from policymaking co-production, throughout recent Portuguese history and in present-day participatory budget initiatives. From competing national actors to influences from the Global North and Global South, the final outcome reflects a learning process in collaboration but also underlying power struggles. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022-07-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9258755/ /pubmed/35818449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00551-z Text en © European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Goulart, Pedro Falanga, Roberto Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery |
title | Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery |
title_full | Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery |
title_fullStr | Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery |
title_short | Co-production and Voice in Policymaking: Participatory Processes in the European Periphery |
title_sort | co-production and voice in policymaking: participatory processes in the european periphery |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35818449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00551-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goulartpedro coproductionandvoiceinpolicymakingparticipatoryprocessesintheeuropeanperiphery AT falangaroberto coproductionandvoiceinpolicymakingparticipatoryprocessesintheeuropeanperiphery |