Cargando…

The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context

To address challenges in management and conservation of fishes and fisheries it is essential to understand their life histories and energetics. The Add-my-Pet (AmP) collection of data on energetics and Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) parameters currently contains 1150 of the 40000 extant species of fish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lika, Konstadia, Augustine, Starrlight, Kooijman, Sebastiaan A L M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac039
_version_ 1784741624500191232
author Lika, Konstadia
Augustine, Starrlight
Kooijman, Sebastiaan A L M
author_facet Lika, Konstadia
Augustine, Starrlight
Kooijman, Sebastiaan A L M
author_sort Lika, Konstadia
collection PubMed
description To address challenges in management and conservation of fishes and fisheries it is essential to understand their life histories and energetics. The Add-my-Pet (AmP) collection of data on energetics and Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) parameters currently contains 1150 of the 40000 extant species of fish. It gives 250–280 traits per species, depending on the model type that was applied, such as maximum reserve capacity, lifespan, specific respiration and precociality index, based on which the ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) was compared with the four other fish classes (Cyclostomata, Chondrichthyes, Actinistia, Dipnoi) and the Tetrapoda. The Actinopterygii are the only vertebrate class that shows metabolic acceleration, and clearly so in only three sub-clades. Different from chondrichthyans, quite a few species follow the waste-to-hurry strategy, especially small bodied freshwater fish such as tropical annual killifish, but also in small minnows and darters in continental climates. We briefly discuss links between waste-to-hurry, which is associated with a large specific somatic maintenance, and sensitivity for pesticides. We discuss why this interferes with the physical co-variation between maximum reserve capacity and ultimate structural length or weight and explains why maximum reserve capacity increases with body length in chondrichthyans, but not in actinopterygians. Reserve capacity has relevance, e.g. mass-specific maintenance, starvation and the kinetics of lipophyllic compounds (such as pesticides), since reserve is relatively rich in lipids in fish. Also, unlike chondrichthyans, the size at birth is very small and not linked to ultimate size; we discuss the implications. Actinopterygians allocate more to soma, compared with chondrichthyans; the latter allocate more to maturity or reproduction. Actinopterygians, Actinistia and Dipnoi are near the supply-end of the supply–demand spectrum, while chondrichthyans clearly show demand properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9258789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92587892022-07-07 The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context Lika, Konstadia Augustine, Starrlight Kooijman, Sebastiaan A L M Conserv Physiol Research Article To address challenges in management and conservation of fishes and fisheries it is essential to understand their life histories and energetics. The Add-my-Pet (AmP) collection of data on energetics and Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) parameters currently contains 1150 of the 40000 extant species of fish. It gives 250–280 traits per species, depending on the model type that was applied, such as maximum reserve capacity, lifespan, specific respiration and precociality index, based on which the ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) was compared with the four other fish classes (Cyclostomata, Chondrichthyes, Actinistia, Dipnoi) and the Tetrapoda. The Actinopterygii are the only vertebrate class that shows metabolic acceleration, and clearly so in only three sub-clades. Different from chondrichthyans, quite a few species follow the waste-to-hurry strategy, especially small bodied freshwater fish such as tropical annual killifish, but also in small minnows and darters in continental climates. We briefly discuss links between waste-to-hurry, which is associated with a large specific somatic maintenance, and sensitivity for pesticides. We discuss why this interferes with the physical co-variation between maximum reserve capacity and ultimate structural length or weight and explains why maximum reserve capacity increases with body length in chondrichthyans, but not in actinopterygians. Reserve capacity has relevance, e.g. mass-specific maintenance, starvation and the kinetics of lipophyllic compounds (such as pesticides), since reserve is relatively rich in lipids in fish. Also, unlike chondrichthyans, the size at birth is very small and not linked to ultimate size; we discuss the implications. Actinopterygians allocate more to soma, compared with chondrichthyans; the latter allocate more to maturity or reproduction. Actinopterygians, Actinistia and Dipnoi are near the supply-end of the supply–demand spectrum, while chondrichthyans clearly show demand properties. Oxford University Press 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9258789/ /pubmed/35811597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac039 Text en © The authors 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lika, Konstadia
Augustine, Starrlight
Kooijman, Sebastiaan A L M
The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
title The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
title_full The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
title_fullStr The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
title_full_unstemmed The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
title_short The comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
title_sort comparative energetics of the ray-finned fish in an evolutionary context
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac039
work_keys_str_mv AT likakonstadia thecomparativeenergeticsoftherayfinnedfishinanevolutionarycontext
AT augustinestarrlight thecomparativeenergeticsoftherayfinnedfishinanevolutionarycontext
AT kooijmansebastiaanalm thecomparativeenergeticsoftherayfinnedfishinanevolutionarycontext
AT likakonstadia comparativeenergeticsoftherayfinnedfishinanevolutionarycontext
AT augustinestarrlight comparativeenergeticsoftherayfinnedfishinanevolutionarycontext
AT kooijmansebastiaanalm comparativeenergeticsoftherayfinnedfishinanevolutionarycontext