Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
BACKGROUND: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the Check It program, a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited partner treatment program for young Black men conducted in New Orleans since 2017. METHODS: We implemented a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model using a synthetic coho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab818 |
_version_ | 1784741662210129920 |
---|---|
author | Stoecker, Charles Monnette, Alisha Qu, Zhuolin Schmidt, Norine Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare Kissinger, Patricia J |
author_facet | Stoecker, Charles Monnette, Alisha Qu, Zhuolin Schmidt, Norine Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare Kissinger, Patricia J |
author_sort | Stoecker, Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the Check It program, a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited partner treatment program for young Black men conducted in New Orleans since 2017. METHODS: We implemented a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model using a synthetic cohort of 16 181 men and 13 419 women intended to simulate the size of the Black, sexually active population in New Orleans ages 15–24 years. RESULTS: The Check It program cost $196 838 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $117 320–$287 555) to implement, saved 10.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% CI: 7.7–12.7 QALYs), and saved $140 950 (95% CI: −$197 018 to −$105 620) in medical costs per year. The program cost $5468 (95% CI: cost saving, $16 717) per QALY gained. All iterations of the probabilistic model returned cost-effectiveness ratios less than $50 000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The Check It program (a bundled seek, test, and treat chlamydia prevention program for young Black men) is cost-effective under base case assumptions. Communities where Chlamydia trachomatis rates have not declined could consider implementing a similar program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9258938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92589382022-07-07 Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men Stoecker, Charles Monnette, Alisha Qu, Zhuolin Schmidt, Norine Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare Kissinger, Patricia J Clin Infect Dis Major Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the Check It program, a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited partner treatment program for young Black men conducted in New Orleans since 2017. METHODS: We implemented a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model using a synthetic cohort of 16 181 men and 13 419 women intended to simulate the size of the Black, sexually active population in New Orleans ages 15–24 years. RESULTS: The Check It program cost $196 838 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $117 320–$287 555) to implement, saved 10.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% CI: 7.7–12.7 QALYs), and saved $140 950 (95% CI: −$197 018 to −$105 620) in medical costs per year. The program cost $5468 (95% CI: cost saving, $16 717) per QALY gained. All iterations of the probabilistic model returned cost-effectiveness ratios less than $50 000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The Check It program (a bundled seek, test, and treat chlamydia prevention program for young Black men) is cost-effective under base case assumptions. Communities where Chlamydia trachomatis rates have not declined could consider implementing a similar program. Oxford University Press 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9258938/ /pubmed/34864944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab818 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Articles and Commentaries Stoecker, Charles Monnette, Alisha Qu, Zhuolin Schmidt, Norine Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare Kissinger, Patricia J Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men |
title | Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of check it: a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited treatment program for young black men |
topic | Major Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoeckercharles costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen AT monnettealisha costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen AT quzhuolin costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen AT schmidtnorine costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen AT craigkuhnmeganclare costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen AT kissingerpatriciaj costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen |