Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men

BACKGROUND: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the Check It program, a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited partner treatment program for young Black men conducted in New Orleans since 2017. METHODS: We implemented a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model using a synthetic coho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoecker, Charles, Monnette, Alisha, Qu, Zhuolin, Schmidt, Norine, Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare, Kissinger, Patricia J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab818
_version_ 1784741662210129920
author Stoecker, Charles
Monnette, Alisha
Qu, Zhuolin
Schmidt, Norine
Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare
Kissinger, Patricia J
author_facet Stoecker, Charles
Monnette, Alisha
Qu, Zhuolin
Schmidt, Norine
Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare
Kissinger, Patricia J
author_sort Stoecker, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the Check It program, a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited partner treatment program for young Black men conducted in New Orleans since 2017. METHODS: We implemented a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model using a synthetic cohort of 16 181 men and 13 419 women intended to simulate the size of the Black, sexually active population in New Orleans ages 15–24 years. RESULTS: The Check It program cost $196 838 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $117 320–$287 555) to implement, saved 10.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% CI: 7.7–12.7 QALYs), and saved $140 950 (95% CI: −$197 018 to −$105 620) in medical costs per year. The program cost $5468 (95% CI: cost saving, $16 717) per QALY gained. All iterations of the probabilistic model returned cost-effectiveness ratios less than $50 000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The Check It program (a bundled seek, test, and treat chlamydia prevention program for young Black men) is cost-effective under base case assumptions. Communities where Chlamydia trachomatis rates have not declined could consider implementing a similar program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9258938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92589382022-07-07 Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men Stoecker, Charles Monnette, Alisha Qu, Zhuolin Schmidt, Norine Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare Kissinger, Patricia J Clin Infect Dis Major Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the Check It program, a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited partner treatment program for young Black men conducted in New Orleans since 2017. METHODS: We implemented a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model using a synthetic cohort of 16 181 men and 13 419 women intended to simulate the size of the Black, sexually active population in New Orleans ages 15–24 years. RESULTS: The Check It program cost $196 838 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $117 320–$287 555) to implement, saved 10.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% CI: 7.7–12.7 QALYs), and saved $140 950 (95% CI: −$197 018 to −$105 620) in medical costs per year. The program cost $5468 (95% CI: cost saving, $16 717) per QALY gained. All iterations of the probabilistic model returned cost-effectiveness ratios less than $50 000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The Check It program (a bundled seek, test, and treat chlamydia prevention program for young Black men) is cost-effective under base case assumptions. Communities where Chlamydia trachomatis rates have not declined could consider implementing a similar program. Oxford University Press 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9258938/ /pubmed/34864944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab818 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles and Commentaries
Stoecker, Charles
Monnette, Alisha
Qu, Zhuolin
Schmidt, Norine
Craig-Kuhn, Megan Clare
Kissinger, Patricia J
Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
title Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Check It: A Novel Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Expedited Treatment Program for Young Black Men
title_sort cost-effectiveness of check it: a novel community-based chlamydia screening and expedited treatment program for young black men
topic Major Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab818
work_keys_str_mv AT stoeckercharles costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen
AT monnettealisha costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen
AT quzhuolin costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen
AT schmidtnorine costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen
AT craigkuhnmeganclare costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen
AT kissingerpatriciaj costeffectivenessofcheckitanovelcommunitybasedchlamydiascreeningandexpeditedtreatmentprogramforyoungblackmen