Cargando…
How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations have been put forward. Based on the processing fluency account, the source of the Aha! experience is a s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911904 |
_version_ | 1784741663256608768 |
---|---|
author | Moroshkina, Nadezhda V. Savina, Alina I. Ammalainen, Artur V. Gershkovich, Valeria A. Zverev, Ilia V. Lvova, Olga V. |
author_facet | Moroshkina, Nadezhda V. Savina, Alina I. Ammalainen, Artur V. Gershkovich, Valeria A. Zverev, Ilia V. Lvova, Olga V. |
author_sort | Moroshkina, Nadezhda V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations have been put forward. Based on the processing fluency account, the source of the Aha! experience is a sudden increase in processing fluency, associated with emerging of a solution. We hypothesized that in a situation which the Aha! experience accompanies the solution in, the problem would be judged as less difficult, regardless of the objective difficulty. We also planned to confirm previously discovered associations between the Aha! experience and accuracy, confidence, and pleasure. To test the proposed hypothesis, during the preliminary stage of the study, we developed a set of 100 remote associate problems in Russian (RAT-RUS) and asked 125 participants to solve problems and indicate the Aha! moment (after solution generation or solution presentation), confidence, difficulty, and likability of each problem. As expected, the Aha! experience often accompanied correct solutions and correlated with confidence judgments. We also found a positive correlation between the Aha! experience and problem likability. As for the main hypothesis, we confirmed that the Aha! experience after the presentation of the solution was associated with a decrease in subjective difficulty. When participants could not solve a problem but experienced the Aha! moment after the solution was presented to them, the problem was perceived as easier than one without the Aha! experience. We didn’t find the same effect for the Aha! after solution generation. Thus, our study partially supports the processing fluency account and demonstrates the association between the Aha! experience and metacognitive judgments about the accuracy and difficulty of problems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9258945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92589452022-07-07 How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment Moroshkina, Nadezhda V. Savina, Alina I. Ammalainen, Artur V. Gershkovich, Valeria A. Zverev, Ilia V. Lvova, Olga V. Front Psychol Psychology The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations have been put forward. Based on the processing fluency account, the source of the Aha! experience is a sudden increase in processing fluency, associated with emerging of a solution. We hypothesized that in a situation which the Aha! experience accompanies the solution in, the problem would be judged as less difficult, regardless of the objective difficulty. We also planned to confirm previously discovered associations between the Aha! experience and accuracy, confidence, and pleasure. To test the proposed hypothesis, during the preliminary stage of the study, we developed a set of 100 remote associate problems in Russian (RAT-RUS) and asked 125 participants to solve problems and indicate the Aha! moment (after solution generation or solution presentation), confidence, difficulty, and likability of each problem. As expected, the Aha! experience often accompanied correct solutions and correlated with confidence judgments. We also found a positive correlation between the Aha! experience and problem likability. As for the main hypothesis, we confirmed that the Aha! experience after the presentation of the solution was associated with a decrease in subjective difficulty. When participants could not solve a problem but experienced the Aha! moment after the solution was presented to them, the problem was perceived as easier than one without the Aha! experience. We didn’t find the same effect for the Aha! after solution generation. Thus, our study partially supports the processing fluency account and demonstrates the association between the Aha! experience and metacognitive judgments about the accuracy and difficulty of problems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9258945/ /pubmed/35814152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911904 Text en Copyright © 2022 Moroshkina, Savina, Ammalainen, Gershkovich, Zverev and Lvova. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Moroshkina, Nadezhda V. Savina, Alina I. Ammalainen, Artur V. Gershkovich, Valeria A. Zverev, Ilia V. Lvova, Olga V. How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment |
title | How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment |
title_full | How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment |
title_fullStr | How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment |
title_full_unstemmed | How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment |
title_short | How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment |
title_sort | how difficult was it? metacognitive judgments about problems and their solutions after the aha moment |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moroshkinanadezhdav howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment AT savinaalinai howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment AT ammalainenarturv howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment AT gershkovichvaleriaa howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment AT zvereviliav howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment AT lvovaolgav howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment |