Cargando…

How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment

The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations have been put forward. Based on the processing fluency account, the source of the Aha! experience is a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moroshkina, Nadezhda V., Savina, Alina I., Ammalainen, Artur V., Gershkovich, Valeria A., Zverev, Ilia V., Lvova, Olga V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911904
_version_ 1784741663256608768
author Moroshkina, Nadezhda V.
Savina, Alina I.
Ammalainen, Artur V.
Gershkovich, Valeria A.
Zverev, Ilia V.
Lvova, Olga V.
author_facet Moroshkina, Nadezhda V.
Savina, Alina I.
Ammalainen, Artur V.
Gershkovich, Valeria A.
Zverev, Ilia V.
Lvova, Olga V.
author_sort Moroshkina, Nadezhda V.
collection PubMed
description The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations have been put forward. Based on the processing fluency account, the source of the Aha! experience is a sudden increase in processing fluency, associated with emerging of a solution. We hypothesized that in a situation which the Aha! experience accompanies the solution in, the problem would be judged as less difficult, regardless of the objective difficulty. We also planned to confirm previously discovered associations between the Aha! experience and accuracy, confidence, and pleasure. To test the proposed hypothesis, during the preliminary stage of the study, we developed a set of 100 remote associate problems in Russian (RAT-RUS) and asked 125 participants to solve problems and indicate the Aha! moment (after solution generation or solution presentation), confidence, difficulty, and likability of each problem. As expected, the Aha! experience often accompanied correct solutions and correlated with confidence judgments. We also found a positive correlation between the Aha! experience and problem likability. As for the main hypothesis, we confirmed that the Aha! experience after the presentation of the solution was associated with a decrease in subjective difficulty. When participants could not solve a problem but experienced the Aha! moment after the solution was presented to them, the problem was perceived as easier than one without the Aha! experience. We didn’t find the same effect for the Aha! after solution generation. Thus, our study partially supports the processing fluency account and demonstrates the association between the Aha! experience and metacognitive judgments about the accuracy and difficulty of problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9258945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92589452022-07-07 How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment Moroshkina, Nadezhda V. Savina, Alina I. Ammalainen, Artur V. Gershkovich, Valeria A. Zverev, Ilia V. Lvova, Olga V. Front Psychol Psychology The insight phenomenon is thought to comprise two components: cognitive and affective (the Aha! experience). The exact nature of the Aha! experience remains unclear; however, several explanations have been put forward. Based on the processing fluency account, the source of the Aha! experience is a sudden increase in processing fluency, associated with emerging of a solution. We hypothesized that in a situation which the Aha! experience accompanies the solution in, the problem would be judged as less difficult, regardless of the objective difficulty. We also planned to confirm previously discovered associations between the Aha! experience and accuracy, confidence, and pleasure. To test the proposed hypothesis, during the preliminary stage of the study, we developed a set of 100 remote associate problems in Russian (RAT-RUS) and asked 125 participants to solve problems and indicate the Aha! moment (after solution generation or solution presentation), confidence, difficulty, and likability of each problem. As expected, the Aha! experience often accompanied correct solutions and correlated with confidence judgments. We also found a positive correlation between the Aha! experience and problem likability. As for the main hypothesis, we confirmed that the Aha! experience after the presentation of the solution was associated with a decrease in subjective difficulty. When participants could not solve a problem but experienced the Aha! moment after the solution was presented to them, the problem was perceived as easier than one without the Aha! experience. We didn’t find the same effect for the Aha! after solution generation. Thus, our study partially supports the processing fluency account and demonstrates the association between the Aha! experience and metacognitive judgments about the accuracy and difficulty of problems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9258945/ /pubmed/35814152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911904 Text en Copyright © 2022 Moroshkina, Savina, Ammalainen, Gershkovich, Zverev and Lvova. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Moroshkina, Nadezhda V.
Savina, Alina I.
Ammalainen, Artur V.
Gershkovich, Valeria A.
Zverev, Ilia V.
Lvova, Olga V.
How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
title How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
title_full How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
title_fullStr How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
title_full_unstemmed How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
title_short How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment
title_sort how difficult was it? metacognitive judgments about problems and their solutions after the aha moment
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911904
work_keys_str_mv AT moroshkinanadezhdav howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment
AT savinaalinai howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment
AT ammalainenarturv howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment
AT gershkovichvaleriaa howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment
AT zvereviliav howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment
AT lvovaolgav howdifficultwasitmetacognitivejudgmentsaboutproblemsandtheirsolutionsaftertheahamoment