Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the performance of AI at detecting early Barrett's neoplasia. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.890720 |
_version_ | 1784741663509315584 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Jin Lin Chinnaratha, Mohamed Asif Woodman, Richard Martin, Rory Chen, Hsiang-Ting Carneiro, Gustavo Singh, Rajvinder |
author_facet | Tan, Jin Lin Chinnaratha, Mohamed Asif Woodman, Richard Martin, Rory Chen, Hsiang-Ting Carneiro, Gustavo Singh, Rajvinder |
author_sort | Tan, Jin Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the performance of AI at detecting early Barrett's neoplasia. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials database from inception to the 28th Jan 2022 to identify studies on the detection of early Barrett's neoplasia using AI. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies – 2 (QUADAS-2). A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostics odds ratio (DOR). Forest plots and a summary of the receiving operating characteristics (SROC) curves displayed the outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined by I(2), Tau(2) statistics and p-value. The funnel plots and Deek's test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising of 1,361 patients (utilizing 532,328 images on which the various AI models were trained) were used. The SROC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were 90.3% (95% CI: 87.1–92.7%), 84.4% (95% CI: 80.2–87.9%) and 48.1 (95% CI: 28.4–81.5), respectively. Subgroup analysis of AI models trained only on white light endoscopy was similar with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91.2% (95% CI: 85.7–94.7%) and 85.1% (95% CI: 81.6%−88.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AI is highly accurate at detecting early Barrett's neoplasia and validated for patients with at least high-grade dysplasia and above. Further well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies of all histopathological subtypes of early Barrett's neoplasia are needed to confirm these findings further. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9258946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92589462022-07-07 Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tan, Jin Lin Chinnaratha, Mohamed Asif Woodman, Richard Martin, Rory Chen, Hsiang-Ting Carneiro, Gustavo Singh, Rajvinder Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the performance of AI at detecting early Barrett's neoplasia. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials database from inception to the 28th Jan 2022 to identify studies on the detection of early Barrett's neoplasia using AI. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies – 2 (QUADAS-2). A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostics odds ratio (DOR). Forest plots and a summary of the receiving operating characteristics (SROC) curves displayed the outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined by I(2), Tau(2) statistics and p-value. The funnel plots and Deek's test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising of 1,361 patients (utilizing 532,328 images on which the various AI models were trained) were used. The SROC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were 90.3% (95% CI: 87.1–92.7%), 84.4% (95% CI: 80.2–87.9%) and 48.1 (95% CI: 28.4–81.5), respectively. Subgroup analysis of AI models trained only on white light endoscopy was similar with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91.2% (95% CI: 85.7–94.7%) and 85.1% (95% CI: 81.6%−88.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AI is highly accurate at detecting early Barrett's neoplasia and validated for patients with at least high-grade dysplasia and above. Further well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies of all histopathological subtypes of early Barrett's neoplasia are needed to confirm these findings further. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9258946/ /pubmed/35814747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.890720 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tan, Chinnaratha, Woodman, Martin, Chen, Carneiro and Singh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Tan, Jin Lin Chinnaratha, Mohamed Asif Woodman, Richard Martin, Rory Chen, Hsiang-Ting Carneiro, Gustavo Singh, Rajvinder Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (ai) to detect early neoplasia in barrett's esophagus: a non-comparative systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.890720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanjinlin diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chinnarathamohamedasif diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT woodmanrichard diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinrory diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenhsiangting diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carneirogustavo diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singhrajvinder diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceaitodetectearlyneoplasiainbarrettsesophagusanoncomparativesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |