Cargando…
Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and us...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855318 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.150 |
_version_ | 1784741758936023040 |
---|---|
author | Hussein, Mostafa Omran Hussein, Lamis Ahmed |
author_facet | Hussein, Mostafa Omran Hussein, Lamis Ahmed |
author_sort | Hussein, Mostafa Omran |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied. RESULTS: The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities. CONCLUSION: Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support’s density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9259348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92593482022-07-18 Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters Hussein, Mostafa Omran Hussein, Lamis Ahmed J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied. RESULTS: The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities. CONCLUSION: Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support’s density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2022-06 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9259348/ /pubmed/35855318 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.150 Text en © 2022 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hussein, Mostafa Omran Hussein, Lamis Ahmed Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
title | Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
title_full | Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
title_fullStr | Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
title_short | Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
title_sort | trueness of 3d printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855318 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT husseinmostafaomran truenessof3dprintedpartialdentureframeworksbuildorientationsandsupportstructuredensityparameters AT husseinlamisahmed truenessof3dprintedpartialdentureframeworksbuildorientationsandsupportstructuredensityparameters |