Cargando…

Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures

BACKGROUND: As health care shifts to value-based models, one strategy within orthopedics has been to transition appropriate cases to outpatient or ambulatory settings to reduce costs; however, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of this practice for isolated ankle fractures. The purpos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasic, Nicholas, Akindolire, Jason, Churchill, Laura, Ndoja, Silvio, Del Balso, Christopher, Lawendy, Abdel-Rahman, Lanting, Brent, Degen, Ryan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016420
_version_ 1784741767454654464
author Pasic, Nicholas
Akindolire, Jason
Churchill, Laura
Ndoja, Silvio
Del Balso, Christopher
Lawendy, Abdel-Rahman
Lanting, Brent
Degen, Ryan M.
author_facet Pasic, Nicholas
Akindolire, Jason
Churchill, Laura
Ndoja, Silvio
Del Balso, Christopher
Lawendy, Abdel-Rahman
Lanting, Brent
Degen, Ryan M.
author_sort Pasic, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As health care shifts to value-based models, one strategy within orthopedics has been to transition appropriate cases to outpatient or ambulatory settings to reduce costs; however, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of this practice for isolated ankle fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost and safety associated with inpatient versus outpatient ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: All patients who underwent ORIF of isolated closed ankle fractures at 2 affiliated hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were identified retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidities and injuryspecific variables, were collected. We grouped patients based on whether they underwent ankle ORIF as an inpatient or outpatient. We determined case costing for all patients and analyzed it using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients (125 inpatient, 71 outpatient) were included for analysis. Inpatients had a significantly longer mean length of stay than outpatients (54.3 h [standard deviation (SD) 36.3 h] v. 7.5 h [SD 1.7 h], p < 0.001). The average cost was significantly higher for the inpatient cohort than the outpatient cohort ($4137 [SD $2285] v. $1834 [SD $421], p < 0.001). There were more unimalleolar ankle fractures in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (42 [59.2%] v. 41 [32.8%], p < 0.001). Outpatients waited longer for surgery than inpatients (9.6 d [SD 5.6 d] v. 2.0 d [SD 3.3 d], p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (11.2%) in the inpatient group presented to the emergency department or were readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, compared to 5 (7.0%) in the outpatient group (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of isolated closed ankle fractures, outpatient surgery was associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and overall case cost compared to inpatient surgery, with no significant difference in readmission or reoperation rates. In medically appropriate patients, isolated ankle ORIF can be performed safely in an ambulatory setting and is associated with significant cost savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9259383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92593832022-07-10 Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures Pasic, Nicholas Akindolire, Jason Churchill, Laura Ndoja, Silvio Del Balso, Christopher Lawendy, Abdel-Rahman Lanting, Brent Degen, Ryan M. Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: As health care shifts to value-based models, one strategy within orthopedics has been to transition appropriate cases to outpatient or ambulatory settings to reduce costs; however, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of this practice for isolated ankle fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost and safety associated with inpatient versus outpatient ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: All patients who underwent ORIF of isolated closed ankle fractures at 2 affiliated hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were identified retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidities and injuryspecific variables, were collected. We grouped patients based on whether they underwent ankle ORIF as an inpatient or outpatient. We determined case costing for all patients and analyzed it using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients (125 inpatient, 71 outpatient) were included for analysis. Inpatients had a significantly longer mean length of stay than outpatients (54.3 h [standard deviation (SD) 36.3 h] v. 7.5 h [SD 1.7 h], p < 0.001). The average cost was significantly higher for the inpatient cohort than the outpatient cohort ($4137 [SD $2285] v. $1834 [SD $421], p < 0.001). There were more unimalleolar ankle fractures in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (42 [59.2%] v. 41 [32.8%], p < 0.001). Outpatients waited longer for surgery than inpatients (9.6 d [SD 5.6 d] v. 2.0 d [SD 3.3 d], p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (11.2%) in the inpatient group presented to the emergency department or were readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, compared to 5 (7.0%) in the outpatient group (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of isolated closed ankle fractures, outpatient surgery was associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and overall case cost compared to inpatient surgery, with no significant difference in readmission or reoperation rates. In medically appropriate patients, isolated ankle ORIF can be performed safely in an ambulatory setting and is associated with significant cost savings. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9259383/ /pubmed/35396267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016420 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Pasic, Nicholas
Akindolire, Jason
Churchill, Laura
Ndoja, Silvio
Del Balso, Christopher
Lawendy, Abdel-Rahman
Lanting, Brent
Degen, Ryan M.
Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
title Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
title_full Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
title_fullStr Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
title_full_unstemmed Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
title_short Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
title_sort cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016420
work_keys_str_mv AT pasicnicholas costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT akindolirejason costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT churchilllaura costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT ndojasilvio costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT delbalsochristopher costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT lawendyabdelrahman costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT lantingbrent costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures
AT degenryanm costandsafetyofinpatientversusoutpatientopenreductioninternalfixationofisolatedanklefractures