Cargando…

Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: In Ontario, patients with breast cancer typically receive their diagnoses through the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) after an abnormal screen, through screening initiated by a primary care provider or other referring physician, or through follow-up of symptoms by patients’ prima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habbous, Steven, Homenauth, Esha, Barisic, Andriana, Kandasamy, Sharmilaa, Majpruz, Vicky, Forster, Katharina, Yurcan, Marta, Chiarelli, Anna M., Groome, Patti, Holloway, Claire M.B., Eisen, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383035
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210254
_version_ 1784741780287127552
author Habbous, Steven
Homenauth, Esha
Barisic, Andriana
Kandasamy, Sharmilaa
Majpruz, Vicky
Forster, Katharina
Yurcan, Marta
Chiarelli, Anna M.
Groome, Patti
Holloway, Claire M.B.
Eisen, Andrea
author_facet Habbous, Steven
Homenauth, Esha
Barisic, Andriana
Kandasamy, Sharmilaa
Majpruz, Vicky
Forster, Katharina
Yurcan, Marta
Chiarelli, Anna M.
Groome, Patti
Holloway, Claire M.B.
Eisen, Andrea
author_sort Habbous, Steven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Ontario, patients with breast cancer typically receive their diagnoses through the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) after an abnormal screen, through screening initiated by a primary care provider or other referring physician, or through follow-up of symptoms by patients’ primary care providers. We sought to explore the association of the route to diagnosis (screening within or outside the OBSP or via symptomatic presentation) with use of OBSP-affiliated breast assessment sites (O-BAS), wait times until diagnosis or treatment, health care use and overall survival for patients with breast cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify adults (aged 18–105 yr) who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2013 to 2017. We excluded patients if they were not Ontario residents or had missing age or sex, or who died before diagnosis. We used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with categorical variables (whether patients were or were not referred to an OBAS, whether patients were screened or symptomatic) and Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 51 460 patients with breast cancer, 42 598 (83%) received their diagnoses at an O-BAS. Patients whose cancer was first detected through the OBSP were more likely than symptomatic patients to be given a diagnosis at an O-BAS (adjusted odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57 to 1.80). Patients screened by the OBSP were given their diagnoses 1 month earlier than symptomatic patients, but diagnosis at an O-BAS did not affect the time until either diagnosis or treatment. Patients referred to an O-BAS had significantly better overall survival than those who were not referred (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). INTERPRETATION: Patients screened through the OBSP were given their diagnoses earlier than symptomatic patients and were more likely to be referred to an O-BAS, which was associated with better survival. Our findings suggest that individuals with signs and symptoms of breast cancer would benefit from similar referral processes, oversight and standards to those used by the OBSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9259434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92594342022-07-10 Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study Habbous, Steven Homenauth, Esha Barisic, Andriana Kandasamy, Sharmilaa Majpruz, Vicky Forster, Katharina Yurcan, Marta Chiarelli, Anna M. Groome, Patti Holloway, Claire M.B. Eisen, Andrea CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: In Ontario, patients with breast cancer typically receive their diagnoses through the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) after an abnormal screen, through screening initiated by a primary care provider or other referring physician, or through follow-up of symptoms by patients’ primary care providers. We sought to explore the association of the route to diagnosis (screening within or outside the OBSP or via symptomatic presentation) with use of OBSP-affiliated breast assessment sites (O-BAS), wait times until diagnosis or treatment, health care use and overall survival for patients with breast cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify adults (aged 18–105 yr) who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2013 to 2017. We excluded patients if they were not Ontario residents or had missing age or sex, or who died before diagnosis. We used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with categorical variables (whether patients were or were not referred to an OBAS, whether patients were screened or symptomatic) and Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 51 460 patients with breast cancer, 42 598 (83%) received their diagnoses at an O-BAS. Patients whose cancer was first detected through the OBSP were more likely than symptomatic patients to be given a diagnosis at an O-BAS (adjusted odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57 to 1.80). Patients screened by the OBSP were given their diagnoses 1 month earlier than symptomatic patients, but diagnosis at an O-BAS did not affect the time until either diagnosis or treatment. Patients referred to an O-BAS had significantly better overall survival than those who were not referred (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). INTERPRETATION: Patients screened through the OBSP were given their diagnoses earlier than symptomatic patients and were more likely to be referred to an O-BAS, which was associated with better survival. Our findings suggest that individuals with signs and symptoms of breast cancer would benefit from similar referral processes, oversight and standards to those used by the OBSP. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9259434/ /pubmed/35383035 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210254 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Habbous, Steven
Homenauth, Esha
Barisic, Andriana
Kandasamy, Sharmilaa
Majpruz, Vicky
Forster, Katharina
Yurcan, Marta
Chiarelli, Anna M.
Groome, Patti
Holloway, Claire M.B.
Eisen, Andrea
Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
title Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in ontario: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383035
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210254
work_keys_str_mv AT habboussteven differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT homenauthesha differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT barisicandriana differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kandasamysharmilaa differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT majpruzvicky differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT forsterkatharina differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yurcanmarta differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chiarelliannam differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT groomepatti differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hollowayclairemb differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT eisenandrea differencesinbreastcancerdiagnosisbypatientpresentationinontarioaretrospectivecohortstudy