Cargando…

Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures

ABSTRACT: The electrochemical process of microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is used to drive the metabolism of electroactive microorganisms for the production of valuable chemicals and fuels. MES combines the advantages of electrochemistry, engineering, and microbiology and offers alternative producti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hengsbach, Jan-Niklas, Sabel-Becker, Björn, Ulber, Roland, Holtmann, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12031-9
_version_ 1784741800958754816
author Hengsbach, Jan-Niklas
Sabel-Becker, Björn
Ulber, Roland
Holtmann, Dirk
author_facet Hengsbach, Jan-Niklas
Sabel-Becker, Björn
Ulber, Roland
Holtmann, Dirk
author_sort Hengsbach, Jan-Niklas
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: The electrochemical process of microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is used to drive the metabolism of electroactive microorganisms for the production of valuable chemicals and fuels. MES combines the advantages of electrochemistry, engineering, and microbiology and offers alternative production processes based on renewable raw materials and regenerative energies. In addition to the reactor concept and electrode design, the biocatalysts used have a significant influence on the performance of MES. Thus, pure and mixed cultures can be used as biocatalysts. By using mixed cultures, interactions between organisms, such as the direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) or syntrophic interactions, influence the performance in terms of productivity and the product range of MES. This review focuses on the comparison of pure and mixed cultures in microbial electrosynthesis. The performance indicators, such as productivities and coulombic efficiencies (CEs), for both procedural methods are discussed. Typical products in MES are methane and acetate, therefore these processes are the focus of this review. In general, most studies used mixed cultures as biocatalyst, as more advanced performance of mixed cultures has been seen for both products. When comparing pure and mixed cultures in equivalent experimental setups a 3-fold higher methane and a nearly 2-fold higher acetate production rate can be achieved in mixed cultures. However, studies of pure culture MES for methane production have shown some improvement through reactor optimization and operational mode reaching similar performance indicators as mixed culture MES. Overall, the review gives an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of using pure or mixed cultures in MES. KEY POINTS: • Undefined mixed cultures dominate as inoculums for the MES of methane and acetate, which comprise a high potential of improvement • Under similar conditions, mixed cultures outperform pure cultures in MES • Understanding the role of single species in mixed culture MES is essential for future industrial applications
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9259517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92595172022-07-08 Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures Hengsbach, Jan-Niklas Sabel-Becker, Björn Ulber, Roland Holtmann, Dirk Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Mini-Review ABSTRACT: The electrochemical process of microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is used to drive the metabolism of electroactive microorganisms for the production of valuable chemicals and fuels. MES combines the advantages of electrochemistry, engineering, and microbiology and offers alternative production processes based on renewable raw materials and regenerative energies. In addition to the reactor concept and electrode design, the biocatalysts used have a significant influence on the performance of MES. Thus, pure and mixed cultures can be used as biocatalysts. By using mixed cultures, interactions between organisms, such as the direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) or syntrophic interactions, influence the performance in terms of productivity and the product range of MES. This review focuses on the comparison of pure and mixed cultures in microbial electrosynthesis. The performance indicators, such as productivities and coulombic efficiencies (CEs), for both procedural methods are discussed. Typical products in MES are methane and acetate, therefore these processes are the focus of this review. In general, most studies used mixed cultures as biocatalyst, as more advanced performance of mixed cultures has been seen for both products. When comparing pure and mixed cultures in equivalent experimental setups a 3-fold higher methane and a nearly 2-fold higher acetate production rate can be achieved in mixed cultures. However, studies of pure culture MES for methane production have shown some improvement through reactor optimization and operational mode reaching similar performance indicators as mixed culture MES. Overall, the review gives an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of using pure or mixed cultures in MES. KEY POINTS: • Undefined mixed cultures dominate as inoculums for the MES of methane and acetate, which comprise a high potential of improvement • Under similar conditions, mixed cultures outperform pure cultures in MES • Understanding the role of single species in mixed culture MES is essential for future industrial applications Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9259517/ /pubmed/35763070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12031-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mini-Review
Hengsbach, Jan-Niklas
Sabel-Becker, Björn
Ulber, Roland
Holtmann, Dirk
Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
title Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
title_full Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
title_fullStr Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
title_full_unstemmed Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
title_short Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
title_sort microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate—comparison of pure and mixed cultures
topic Mini-Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12031-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hengsbachjanniklas microbialelectrosynthesisofmethaneandacetatecomparisonofpureandmixedcultures
AT sabelbeckerbjorn microbialelectrosynthesisofmethaneandacetatecomparisonofpureandmixedcultures
AT ulberroland microbialelectrosynthesisofmethaneandacetatecomparisonofpureandmixedcultures
AT holtmanndirk microbialelectrosynthesisofmethaneandacetatecomparisonofpureandmixedcultures