Cargando…

Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner

BACKGROUND: The unsurpassed sensitivity of intracranial electroencephalography (icEEG) and the growing interest in understanding human brain networks and ongoing activities in health and disease have make the simultaneous icEEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition (icEEG-fMRI) an at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Yuya, Khoo, Hui Ming, Hirayama, Miki, Kawahara, Masaaki, Koyama, Yoshihiro, Tarewaki, Hiroyuki, Arisawa, Atsuko, Yanagisawa, Takufumi, Tani, Naoki, Oshino, Satoru, Lemieux, Louis, Kishima, Haruhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812224
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.921922
_version_ 1784741884192620544
author Fujita, Yuya
Khoo, Hui Ming
Hirayama, Miki
Kawahara, Masaaki
Koyama, Yoshihiro
Tarewaki, Hiroyuki
Arisawa, Atsuko
Yanagisawa, Takufumi
Tani, Naoki
Oshino, Satoru
Lemieux, Louis
Kishima, Haruhiko
author_facet Fujita, Yuya
Khoo, Hui Ming
Hirayama, Miki
Kawahara, Masaaki
Koyama, Yoshihiro
Tarewaki, Hiroyuki
Arisawa, Atsuko
Yanagisawa, Takufumi
Tani, Naoki
Oshino, Satoru
Lemieux, Louis
Kishima, Haruhiko
author_sort Fujita, Yuya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The unsurpassed sensitivity of intracranial electroencephalography (icEEG) and the growing interest in understanding human brain networks and ongoing activities in health and disease have make the simultaneous icEEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition (icEEG-fMRI) an attractive investigation tool. However, safety remains a crucial consideration, particularly due to the impact of the specific characteristics of icEEG and MRI technologies that were safe when used separately but may risk health when combined. Using a clinical 3-T scanner with body transmit and head-receive coils, we assessed the safety and feasibility of our icEEG-fMRI protocol. METHODS: Using platinum and platinum-iridium grid and depth electrodes implanted in a custom-made acrylic-gel phantom, we assessed safety by focusing on three factors. First, we measured radio frequency (RF)-induced heating of the electrodes during fast spin echo (FSE, as a control) and the three sequences in our icEEG-fMRI protocol. Heating was evaluated with electrodes placed orthogonal or parallel to the static magnetic field. Using the configuration with the greatest heating observed, we then measured the total heating induced in our protocol, which is a continuous 70-min icEEG-fMRI session comprising localizer, echo-planar imaging (EPI), and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequences. Second, we measured the gradient switching-induced voltage using configurations mimicking electrode implantation in the frontal and temporal lobes. Third, we assessed the gradient switching-induced electrode movement by direct visual detection and image analyses. RESULTS: On average, RF-induced local heating on the icEEG electrode contacts tested were greater in the orthogonal than parallel configuration, with a maximum increase of 0.2°C during EPI and 1.9°C during FSE. The total local heating was below the 1°C safety limit across all contacts tested during the 70-min icEEG-fMRI session. The induced voltage was within the 100-mV safety limit regardless of the configuration. No gradient switching-induced electrode displacement was observed. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that the additional health risks associated with heating, neuronal stimulation, or device movement are low when acquiring fMRI at 3 T in the presence of clinical icEEG electrodes under the conditions reported in this study. High specific absorption ratio sequences such as FSE should be avoided to prevent potential inadvertent tissue heating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9259878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92598782022-07-08 Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner Fujita, Yuya Khoo, Hui Ming Hirayama, Miki Kawahara, Masaaki Koyama, Yoshihiro Tarewaki, Hiroyuki Arisawa, Atsuko Yanagisawa, Takufumi Tani, Naoki Oshino, Satoru Lemieux, Louis Kishima, Haruhiko Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: The unsurpassed sensitivity of intracranial electroencephalography (icEEG) and the growing interest in understanding human brain networks and ongoing activities in health and disease have make the simultaneous icEEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition (icEEG-fMRI) an attractive investigation tool. However, safety remains a crucial consideration, particularly due to the impact of the specific characteristics of icEEG and MRI technologies that were safe when used separately but may risk health when combined. Using a clinical 3-T scanner with body transmit and head-receive coils, we assessed the safety and feasibility of our icEEG-fMRI protocol. METHODS: Using platinum and platinum-iridium grid and depth electrodes implanted in a custom-made acrylic-gel phantom, we assessed safety by focusing on three factors. First, we measured radio frequency (RF)-induced heating of the electrodes during fast spin echo (FSE, as a control) and the three sequences in our icEEG-fMRI protocol. Heating was evaluated with electrodes placed orthogonal or parallel to the static magnetic field. Using the configuration with the greatest heating observed, we then measured the total heating induced in our protocol, which is a continuous 70-min icEEG-fMRI session comprising localizer, echo-planar imaging (EPI), and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequences. Second, we measured the gradient switching-induced voltage using configurations mimicking electrode implantation in the frontal and temporal lobes. Third, we assessed the gradient switching-induced electrode movement by direct visual detection and image analyses. RESULTS: On average, RF-induced local heating on the icEEG electrode contacts tested were greater in the orthogonal than parallel configuration, with a maximum increase of 0.2°C during EPI and 1.9°C during FSE. The total local heating was below the 1°C safety limit across all contacts tested during the 70-min icEEG-fMRI session. The induced voltage was within the 100-mV safety limit regardless of the configuration. No gradient switching-induced electrode displacement was observed. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that the additional health risks associated with heating, neuronal stimulation, or device movement are low when acquiring fMRI at 3 T in the presence of clinical icEEG electrodes under the conditions reported in this study. High specific absorption ratio sequences such as FSE should be avoided to prevent potential inadvertent tissue heating. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9259878/ /pubmed/35812224 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.921922 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fujita, Khoo, Hirayama, Kawahara, Koyama, Tarewaki, Arisawa, Yanagisawa, Tani, Oshino, Lemieux and Kishima. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fujita, Yuya
Khoo, Hui Ming
Hirayama, Miki
Kawahara, Masaaki
Koyama, Yoshihiro
Tarewaki, Hiroyuki
Arisawa, Atsuko
Yanagisawa, Takufumi
Tani, Naoki
Oshino, Satoru
Lemieux, Louis
Kishima, Haruhiko
Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
title Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
title_full Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
title_fullStr Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
title_short Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
title_sort evaluating the safety of simultaneous intracranial electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition using a 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812224
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.921922
work_keys_str_mv AT fujitayuya evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT khoohuiming evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT hirayamamiki evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT kawaharamasaaki evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT koyamayoshihiro evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT tarewakihiroyuki evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT arisawaatsuko evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT yanagisawatakufumi evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT taninaoki evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT oshinosatoru evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT lemieuxlouis evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner
AT kishimaharuhiko evaluatingthesafetyofsimultaneousintracranialelectroencephalographyandfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingacquisitionusinga3teslamagneticresonanceimagingscanner