Cargando…
The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia
BACKGROUND: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is characterized by angiodysplastic lesions and is a rare form of gastrointestinal bleeding. Given the multiple patterns, GAVE can be misclassified. AIM: We analyzed the misclassification of GAVE among patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813901 |
_version_ | 1784742007066853376 |
---|---|
author | Aryan, Mahmoud Jariwala, Ravi Alkurdi, Basem Peter, Shajan Shoreibah, Mohamed |
author_facet | Aryan, Mahmoud Jariwala, Ravi Alkurdi, Basem Peter, Shajan Shoreibah, Mohamed |
author_sort | Aryan, Mahmoud |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is characterized by angiodysplastic lesions and is a rare form of gastrointestinal bleeding. Given the multiple patterns, GAVE can be misclassified. AIM: We analyzed the misclassification of GAVE among patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 941 EGDs between 2017 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included findings of GAVE on EGD±biopsy. Correct classification was based on visual EGD findings. Outcome variables included misclassification rate, endoscopist’s background, and concordance between EGD and pathology. Cohen’s Kappa test was used for concordance analysis. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients had EGD findings of GAVE with a corresponding 184 EGDs. The misclassification rate among EGDs was 74/184 (40%). Furthermore, 81/110 patients were correctly classified with their first workup, whereas 29/110 patients needed repeat testing. In cases of misclassification, GAVE was mostly referred to as erythema (43%), with ulceration, gastritis, or polyps. Sixty-six (60%) patients had biopsies with a concordance of 76% between EGD and biopsy (κ=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate GAVE was misclassified up to 40% on EGDs with hepatologists and gastroenterologists having similar misclassification rates. Proper identification is crucial given susceptibility to upper gastrointestinal bleeding. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: This study emphasizes the importance of accurate classification of GAVE to ensure proper treatment of these lesions which can improve clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9260348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92603482022-07-07 The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia Aryan, Mahmoud Jariwala, Ravi Alkurdi, Basem Peter, Shajan Shoreibah, Mohamed J Clin Transl Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is characterized by angiodysplastic lesions and is a rare form of gastrointestinal bleeding. Given the multiple patterns, GAVE can be misclassified. AIM: We analyzed the misclassification of GAVE among patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 941 EGDs between 2017 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included findings of GAVE on EGD±biopsy. Correct classification was based on visual EGD findings. Outcome variables included misclassification rate, endoscopist’s background, and concordance between EGD and pathology. Cohen’s Kappa test was used for concordance analysis. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients had EGD findings of GAVE with a corresponding 184 EGDs. The misclassification rate among EGDs was 74/184 (40%). Furthermore, 81/110 patients were correctly classified with their first workup, whereas 29/110 patients needed repeat testing. In cases of misclassification, GAVE was mostly referred to as erythema (43%), with ulceration, gastritis, or polyps. Sixty-six (60%) patients had biopsies with a concordance of 76% between EGD and biopsy (κ=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate GAVE was misclassified up to 40% on EGDs with hepatologists and gastroenterologists having similar misclassification rates. Proper identification is crucial given susceptibility to upper gastrointestinal bleeding. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: This study emphasizes the importance of accurate classification of GAVE to ensure proper treatment of these lesions which can improve clinical outcomes. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9260348/ /pubmed/35813901 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, permitting all noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aryan, Mahmoud Jariwala, Ravi Alkurdi, Basem Peter, Shajan Shoreibah, Mohamed The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title | The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_full | The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_fullStr | The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_full_unstemmed | The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_short | The misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_sort | misclassification of gastric antral vascular ectasia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aryanmahmoud themisclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT jariwalaravi themisclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT alkurdibasem themisclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT petershajan themisclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT shoreibahmohamed themisclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT aryanmahmoud misclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT jariwalaravi misclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT alkurdibasem misclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT petershajan misclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia AT shoreibahmohamed misclassificationofgastricantralvascularectasia |