Cargando…

Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To determine whether implant density impact three-dimensional deformity correction in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) without Ponte osteotomies (POs) for patients with Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Curren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong, Berry, Chirag A., Jain, Viral V., Sturm, Peter F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957744
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0398
_version_ 1784742023202340864
author Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong
Berry, Chirag A.
Jain, Viral V.
Sturm, Peter F
author_facet Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong
Berry, Chirag A.
Jain, Viral V.
Sturm, Peter F
author_sort Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To determine whether implant density impact three-dimensional deformity correction in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) without Ponte osteotomies (POs) for patients with Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Currently, the optimal pedicle screw (PS) density for flexible moderate-sized thoracic AIS curve correction is still controversial. There are limited data regarding the impact of implant density on three-dimensional correction in PSF without the use of PO for thoracic AIS surgery. METHODS: A database of patients with AIS with Lenke 1 and 2 curves treated with PSF without PO and instrumented with PSs and ≥2-year follow-up was reviewed. The preoperative, immediate, and final follow-up postoperative radiographs were analyzed. The correlation between PS density and the following factors were determined: major curve correction (MCC), correction index (CI; MCC/curve flexibility), kyphosis angle change, and rib index (RI) correction. Then, patients were divided into low-density (LD) and high-density (HD) groups according to mean PS density for the entire cohort (1.5 PS per level). Demographics and radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 99 patients with Lenke 1 and 23 patients with Lenke 2 AIS. The average MCC was 67.2%. There was no correlation between screw density and these parameters: MCC (r=0.10, p=0.26), CI (r=0.16, p=0.07), change in T2–T12 kyphosis angle (r=−0.13, p=0.14), and RI correction (r=−0.09, p=0.37). Demographic and preoperative radiographic parameters were similar between the LD and HD groups. At the latest follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in regard to MCC, CI, change in T2–T12 kyphosis angle, RI correction, and Scoliosis Research Society-30 scores (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no significant correlation between screw density and curve correction in any planes. HD construct may not provide better deformity correction in patients with flexible and moderate thoracic AIS undergoing PSF without PO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9260411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92604112022-07-19 Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies? Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong Berry, Chirag A. Jain, Viral V. Sturm, Peter F Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To determine whether implant density impact three-dimensional deformity correction in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) without Ponte osteotomies (POs) for patients with Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Currently, the optimal pedicle screw (PS) density for flexible moderate-sized thoracic AIS curve correction is still controversial. There are limited data regarding the impact of implant density on three-dimensional correction in PSF without the use of PO for thoracic AIS surgery. METHODS: A database of patients with AIS with Lenke 1 and 2 curves treated with PSF without PO and instrumented with PSs and ≥2-year follow-up was reviewed. The preoperative, immediate, and final follow-up postoperative radiographs were analyzed. The correlation between PS density and the following factors were determined: major curve correction (MCC), correction index (CI; MCC/curve flexibility), kyphosis angle change, and rib index (RI) correction. Then, patients were divided into low-density (LD) and high-density (HD) groups according to mean PS density for the entire cohort (1.5 PS per level). Demographics and radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 99 patients with Lenke 1 and 23 patients with Lenke 2 AIS. The average MCC was 67.2%. There was no correlation between screw density and these parameters: MCC (r=0.10, p=0.26), CI (r=0.16, p=0.07), change in T2–T12 kyphosis angle (r=−0.13, p=0.14), and RI correction (r=−0.09, p=0.37). Demographic and preoperative radiographic parameters were similar between the LD and HD groups. At the latest follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in regard to MCC, CI, change in T2–T12 kyphosis angle, RI correction, and Scoliosis Research Society-30 scores (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no significant correlation between screw density and curve correction in any planes. HD construct may not provide better deformity correction in patients with flexible and moderate thoracic AIS undergoing PSF without PO. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022-06 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9260411/ /pubmed/33957744 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0398 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lertudomphonwanit, Thamrong
Berry, Chirag A.
Jain, Viral V.
Sturm, Peter F
Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?
title Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?
title_full Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?
title_fullStr Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?
title_full_unstemmed Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?
title_short Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?
title_sort does implant density impact three-dimensional deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with lenke 1 and 2 curves treated by posterior spinal fusion without ponte osteotomies?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957744
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0398
work_keys_str_mv AT lertudomphonwanitthamrong doesimplantdensityimpactthreedimensionaldeformitycorrectioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosiswithlenke1and2curvestreatedbyposteriorspinalfusionwithoutponteosteotomies
AT berrychiraga doesimplantdensityimpactthreedimensionaldeformitycorrectioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosiswithlenke1and2curvestreatedbyposteriorspinalfusionwithoutponteosteotomies
AT jainviralv doesimplantdensityimpactthreedimensionaldeformitycorrectioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosiswithlenke1and2curvestreatedbyposteriorspinalfusionwithoutponteosteotomies
AT sturmpeterf doesimplantdensityimpactthreedimensionaldeformitycorrectioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosiswithlenke1and2curvestreatedbyposteriorspinalfusionwithoutponteosteotomies