Cargando…

Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Spinal Pain Questionnaire: Validation and User Satisfaction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to develop a spoken dialogue system (SDS) for pain questionnaire in patients with spinal disease. We evaluate user satisfaction and validated the performance accuracy of the SDS in medical staff and patients. METHODS: The SDS was developed to investigate pain a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Kyoung Hyup, Kim, Da Young, Kim, Dong Hwan, Lee, Jung Hwan, Lee, Jae Il, Kim, Mi Jeong, Park, Joo Young, Hwang, Jae Hyun, Yun, Sang Seok, Choi, Byung Kwan, Kim, Min Gyu, Han, In Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35577340
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2143080.540
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to develop a spoken dialogue system (SDS) for pain questionnaire in patients with spinal disease. We evaluate user satisfaction and validated the performance accuracy of the SDS in medical staff and patients. METHODS: The SDS was developed to investigate pain and related psychological issues in patients with spinal diseases based on the pain questionnaire protocol. We recognized patients’ various answers, summarized important information, and documented them. User satisfaction and performance accuracy were evaluated in 30 potential users of SDS, including doctors, nurses, and patients and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The overall satisfaction score of 30 patients was 5.5 ± 1.4 out of 7 points. Satisfaction scores were 5.3 ± 0.8 for doctors, 6.0 ± 0.6 for nurses, and 5.3 ± 0.5 for patients. In terms of performance accuracy, the number of repetitions of the same question was 13, 16, and 33 (13.5%, 16.8%, and 34.7%) for doctors, nurses, and patients, respectively. The number of errors in the summarized comment by the SDS was 5, 0, and 11 (5.2%, 0.0%, and 11.6 %), respectively. The number of summarization omissions was 7, 5, and 7 (7.3%, 5.3%, and 7.4%), respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in which voice-based conversational artificial intelligence (AI) was developed for a spinal pain questionnaire and validated by medical staff and patients. The conversational AI showed favorable results in terms of user satisfaction and performance accuracy. Conversational AI can be useful for the diagnosis and remote monitoring of various patients as well as for pain questionnaires in the future.