Cargando…

Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial

AIM: To determine the ideal surgical approach for Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted the randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to August 2016. A total of 105 patients with T1-4N1-3M0 Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas were initially recruited. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Kai, Dong, Jianhong, He, Songbing, Xu, Yingying, Yang, Fan, Han, Guolin, Abe, Masanobu, Zong, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852594
_version_ 1784742072905891840
author Tao, Kai
Dong, Jianhong
He, Songbing
Xu, Yingying
Yang, Fan
Han, Guolin
Abe, Masanobu
Zong, Liang
author_facet Tao, Kai
Dong, Jianhong
He, Songbing
Xu, Yingying
Yang, Fan
Han, Guolin
Abe, Masanobu
Zong, Liang
author_sort Tao, Kai
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the ideal surgical approach for Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted the randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to August 2016. A total of 105 patients with T1-4N1-3M0 Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas were initially recruited. The final follow-up was up to June 30, 2019. Patients were randomized to undergo either a proximal gastrectomy plus jejunal interposition (PG+JI), proximal gastrectomy plus esophagogastrostomy (PG+EG), or total gastrectomy plus Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (TG+RY). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints were 5-year survival and recovery indexes. RESULTS: Among 105 patients, 100 patients (95.2%; mean age, 56.2 years) with tumors <3cm in size underwent surgery: PG+JI (n=33) vs. PG+EG (n=33) and TG+RY (n=34); 91 patients completed the study. Among the groups, the PG+JI group had the longest reconstruction time: 34.11 ± 6.10 min vs. 21.97 ± 3.30 min (PG+EG) vs. 30.56 ± 4.26 min (TG+RY); p<0.001. There was no postoperative mortality. In the per-protocol analysis, the PG+JI group showed a decreased tendency in complication rate: 6.9% vs. 23.3% (PG+EG) vs. 18.8% (TG+RY), but there was no significant difference. For recovery indexes, the TG+RY group had the lowest values of the amount of single meal, weight loss, hemoglobin, albumin, pepsin, and gastrin among the three groups. There was no significant difference among the three groups in 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal gastrectomy is preferable for T1-4N1-3M0 Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas with tumors <3cm in size because of its better nutrition status under similar postoperative complication to total gastrectomy. Jejunal interposition can be recommended as a optional reconstruction approach after proximal gastrectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR-IIR-16007733.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9260592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92605922022-07-08 Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial Tao, Kai Dong, Jianhong He, Songbing Xu, Yingying Yang, Fan Han, Guolin Abe, Masanobu Zong, Liang Front Oncol Oncology AIM: To determine the ideal surgical approach for Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted the randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to August 2016. A total of 105 patients with T1-4N1-3M0 Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas were initially recruited. The final follow-up was up to June 30, 2019. Patients were randomized to undergo either a proximal gastrectomy plus jejunal interposition (PG+JI), proximal gastrectomy plus esophagogastrostomy (PG+EG), or total gastrectomy plus Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (TG+RY). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints were 5-year survival and recovery indexes. RESULTS: Among 105 patients, 100 patients (95.2%; mean age, 56.2 years) with tumors <3cm in size underwent surgery: PG+JI (n=33) vs. PG+EG (n=33) and TG+RY (n=34); 91 patients completed the study. Among the groups, the PG+JI group had the longest reconstruction time: 34.11 ± 6.10 min vs. 21.97 ± 3.30 min (PG+EG) vs. 30.56 ± 4.26 min (TG+RY); p<0.001. There was no postoperative mortality. In the per-protocol analysis, the PG+JI group showed a decreased tendency in complication rate: 6.9% vs. 23.3% (PG+EG) vs. 18.8% (TG+RY), but there was no significant difference. For recovery indexes, the TG+RY group had the lowest values of the amount of single meal, weight loss, hemoglobin, albumin, pepsin, and gastrin among the three groups. There was no significant difference among the three groups in 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal gastrectomy is preferable for T1-4N1-3M0 Siewert type II EGJ carcinomas with tumors <3cm in size because of its better nutrition status under similar postoperative complication to total gastrectomy. Jejunal interposition can be recommended as a optional reconstruction approach after proximal gastrectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR-IIR-16007733. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9260592/ /pubmed/35814411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852594 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tao, Dong, He, Xu, Yang, Han, Abe and Zong https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Tao, Kai
Dong, Jianhong
He, Songbing
Xu, Yingying
Yang, Fan
Han, Guolin
Abe, Masanobu
Zong, Liang
Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Surgical Strategies for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort surgical strategies for siewert type ii esophagogastric junction carcinomas: a randomized controlled trial
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852594
work_keys_str_mv AT taokai surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dongjianhong surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hesongbing surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xuyingying surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangfan surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hanguolin surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abemasanobu surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zongliang surgicalstrategiesforsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctioncarcinomasarandomizedcontrolledtrial