Cargando…

Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods

The purpose of the study is to assess the Environmental Flow Requirement (EFR) of Gorai River in Bangladesh and to evaluate the change in flow characteristics in recent time compared to past. Daily discharge data of Gorai railway bridge station were collected from Bangladesh Water Development Board...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Md. Shahjahan, Hasan, Md. Mahmudul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09857
_version_ 1784742083241705472
author Ali, Md. Shahjahan
Hasan, Md. Mahmudul
author_facet Ali, Md. Shahjahan
Hasan, Md. Mahmudul
author_sort Ali, Md. Shahjahan
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study is to assess the Environmental Flow Requirement (EFR) of Gorai River in Bangladesh and to evaluate the change in flow characteristics in recent time compared to past. Daily discharge data of Gorai railway bridge station were collected from Bangladesh Water Development Board and analyzed for two periods. Mean Annual Flow (MAF) in G2 period (2000–20166) is found about 13% lower than G1 period (1984–1999). The Mean Monthly Flow (MMF) in low flow season is increased by 99%, and that of high flow is decreased by 20% in G2 period compared to G1. In this study, EFR was determined considering various methods including Tennant, Tessmann, Variable Monthly Flow, Modified Constant Yield, FDCA Q(50)-Q(90), FDCA Q(50)-Q(75) and Smakhtin Method. The average EFR for low, high and intermediate flows were found as 89, 915 and 273 m(3)/s, which is 9, 61 and 27% of MAF and 96, 23 and 61% of mean seasonal flow, respectively. The overall annual EFR for the river is found as 295 m(3)/s or 29% of MAF. It is observed that when the EFRs are expressed as percent of mean seasonal flow, the Low-Flow Requirements (LFR) were found higher than High-Flow Requirements (HFR). However, when the EFRs are expressed as percent of MAF, the LFR is lower than HFR. Among all the EFRs predicted by 8 methods, Smakhtin predicts the smallest HFR (6% of MAF) and FDCA Q(50)-Q(90) have the lowest LFR value (1.2% of MAF). The Tennant method is not found to be capable to capture the temporal change of MMF of different seasons. The Average Annual EFR was found to be reduced by 14% in latter period. A deficient flow situation was observed from December to May. The findings can be used for future reference in management of flows in Gorai river.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9260634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92606342022-07-08 Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods Ali, Md. Shahjahan Hasan, Md. Mahmudul Heliyon Research Article The purpose of the study is to assess the Environmental Flow Requirement (EFR) of Gorai River in Bangladesh and to evaluate the change in flow characteristics in recent time compared to past. Daily discharge data of Gorai railway bridge station were collected from Bangladesh Water Development Board and analyzed for two periods. Mean Annual Flow (MAF) in G2 period (2000–20166) is found about 13% lower than G1 period (1984–1999). The Mean Monthly Flow (MMF) in low flow season is increased by 99%, and that of high flow is decreased by 20% in G2 period compared to G1. In this study, EFR was determined considering various methods including Tennant, Tessmann, Variable Monthly Flow, Modified Constant Yield, FDCA Q(50)-Q(90), FDCA Q(50)-Q(75) and Smakhtin Method. The average EFR for low, high and intermediate flows were found as 89, 915 and 273 m(3)/s, which is 9, 61 and 27% of MAF and 96, 23 and 61% of mean seasonal flow, respectively. The overall annual EFR for the river is found as 295 m(3)/s or 29% of MAF. It is observed that when the EFRs are expressed as percent of mean seasonal flow, the Low-Flow Requirements (LFR) were found higher than High-Flow Requirements (HFR). However, when the EFRs are expressed as percent of MAF, the LFR is lower than HFR. Among all the EFRs predicted by 8 methods, Smakhtin predicts the smallest HFR (6% of MAF) and FDCA Q(50)-Q(90) have the lowest LFR value (1.2% of MAF). The Tennant method is not found to be capable to capture the temporal change of MMF of different seasons. The Average Annual EFR was found to be reduced by 14% in latter period. A deficient flow situation was observed from December to May. The findings can be used for future reference in management of flows in Gorai river. Elsevier 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9260634/ /pubmed/35815153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09857 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ali, Md. Shahjahan
Hasan, Md. Mahmudul
Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
title Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
title_full Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
title_fullStr Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
title_short Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
title_sort environmental flow assessment of gorai river in bangladesh: a comparative analysis of different hydrological methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35815153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09857
work_keys_str_mv AT alimdshahjahan environmentalflowassessmentofgorairiverinbangladeshacomparativeanalysisofdifferenthydrologicalmethods
AT hasanmdmahmudul environmentalflowassessmentofgorairiverinbangladeshacomparativeanalysisofdifferenthydrologicalmethods