Cargando…

Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of iterative changes in preoperative and postoperative biopsy techniques on the outcomes of men undergoing the precision prostatectomy procedure. Precision prostatectomy is a novel surgical treatment for prostate cancer that aims to maximally preserve erectogenic nerv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grauer, Ralph, Gorin, Michael A., Sood, Akshay, Butaney, Mohit, Olson, Phil, Farah, Guillaume, Hanna Cole, Renee, Jeong, Wooju, Abdollah, Firas, Menon, Mani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000122
_version_ 1784742123245928448
author Grauer, Ralph
Gorin, Michael A.
Sood, Akshay
Butaney, Mohit
Olson, Phil
Farah, Guillaume
Hanna Cole, Renee
Jeong, Wooju
Abdollah, Firas
Menon, Mani
author_facet Grauer, Ralph
Gorin, Michael A.
Sood, Akshay
Butaney, Mohit
Olson, Phil
Farah, Guillaume
Hanna Cole, Renee
Jeong, Wooju
Abdollah, Firas
Menon, Mani
author_sort Grauer, Ralph
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of iterative changes in preoperative and postoperative biopsy techniques on the outcomes of men undergoing the precision prostatectomy procedure. Precision prostatectomy is a novel surgical treatment for prostate cancer that aims to maximally preserve erectogenic nerves via partial preservation of the prostate capsule. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Single tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 120 patients who consented to undergo prostate cancer treatment with the precision prostatectomy procedure. Patients were originally enrolled in one of two separate prospective protocols studying precision prostatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperatively, 60 patients were screened with transrectal (TR) biopsy and 60 were screened by transperineal (TP) biopsy. Ultimately, 117 patients underwent precision prostatectomy. Of the 43 postoperative biopsies, 19 were TR; 17 were TP with ultrasound; and 7 were TP with microultrasound (mUS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperatively, we evaluated whether the transition to TP biopsy was associated with differences in postoperative treatment failure defined as a neoplasm-positive postoperative biopsy. Postoperative biopsies were compared with respect to their ability to sample the remnant tissue, specifically percentage of cores positive for prostate tissue. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 9/60 (15%) positive postoperative biopsies occurred in the TR group and 6/60 (10%) in the TP group; Kaplan-Meier survival estimates did not differ between groups (p=0.69 by log rank). Postoperatively, the numbers of cores positive for prostate tissue were 99/160 (62%), 63/107 (59%), and 36/39 (92%) in the TR biopsy, TP with ultrasound, and TP with mUS groups, respectively; this difference was statistically significant versus the rate in the TR and standard TP groups (p=0.0003 and 0.0002). CONCLUSION: We found no significant improvement in patient screening, preoperatively—though limited by small sample size and relatively short follow-up. The incorporation of high-frequency mUS for postoperative biopsies improved the ability to sample the remnant tissue with a higher efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9260793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92607932022-07-25 Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure Grauer, Ralph Gorin, Michael A. Sood, Akshay Butaney, Mohit Olson, Phil Farah, Guillaume Hanna Cole, Renee Jeong, Wooju Abdollah, Firas Menon, Mani BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of iterative changes in preoperative and postoperative biopsy techniques on the outcomes of men undergoing the precision prostatectomy procedure. Precision prostatectomy is a novel surgical treatment for prostate cancer that aims to maximally preserve erectogenic nerves via partial preservation of the prostate capsule. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Single tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 120 patients who consented to undergo prostate cancer treatment with the precision prostatectomy procedure. Patients were originally enrolled in one of two separate prospective protocols studying precision prostatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperatively, 60 patients were screened with transrectal (TR) biopsy and 60 were screened by transperineal (TP) biopsy. Ultimately, 117 patients underwent precision prostatectomy. Of the 43 postoperative biopsies, 19 were TR; 17 were TP with ultrasound; and 7 were TP with microultrasound (mUS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperatively, we evaluated whether the transition to TP biopsy was associated with differences in postoperative treatment failure defined as a neoplasm-positive postoperative biopsy. Postoperative biopsies were compared with respect to their ability to sample the remnant tissue, specifically percentage of cores positive for prostate tissue. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 9/60 (15%) positive postoperative biopsies occurred in the TR group and 6/60 (10%) in the TP group; Kaplan-Meier survival estimates did not differ between groups (p=0.69 by log rank). Postoperatively, the numbers of cores positive for prostate tissue were 99/160 (62%), 63/107 (59%), and 36/39 (92%) in the TR biopsy, TP with ultrasound, and TP with mUS groups, respectively; this difference was statistically significant versus the rate in the TR and standard TP groups (p=0.0003 and 0.0002). CONCLUSION: We found no significant improvement in patient screening, preoperatively—though limited by small sample size and relatively short follow-up. The incorporation of high-frequency mUS for postoperative biopsies improved the ability to sample the remnant tissue with a higher efficiency. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9260793/ /pubmed/35892060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000122 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Grauer, Ralph
Gorin, Michael A.
Sood, Akshay
Butaney, Mohit
Olson, Phil
Farah, Guillaume
Hanna Cole, Renee
Jeong, Wooju
Abdollah, Firas
Menon, Mani
Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
title Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
title_full Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
title_fullStr Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
title_full_unstemmed Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
title_short Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
title_sort impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000122
work_keys_str_mv AT grauerralph impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT gorinmichaela impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT soodakshay impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT butaneymohit impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT olsonphil impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT farahguillaume impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT hannacolerenee impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT jeongwooju impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT abdollahfiras impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure
AT menonmani impactofprostatebiopsytechniqueonoutcomesoftheprecisionprostatectomyprocedure