Cargando…

Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation

[Image: see text] Pollutants derived from real textile wastewater present a high environmental risk. This work involves the study of the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, and turbidity from Tunisian real textile wastewater by two different water treatment technologies: chemical coagula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gasmi, Aicha, Ibrahimi, Soumaya, Elboughdiri, Noureddine, Tekaya, Mohamed Aymen, Ghernaout, Djamel, Hannachi, Ahmed, Mesloub, Abdelhakim, Ayadi, Badreddine, Kolsi, Lioua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01652
_version_ 1784742155500126208
author Gasmi, Aicha
Ibrahimi, Soumaya
Elboughdiri, Noureddine
Tekaya, Mohamed Aymen
Ghernaout, Djamel
Hannachi, Ahmed
Mesloub, Abdelhakim
Ayadi, Badreddine
Kolsi, Lioua
author_facet Gasmi, Aicha
Ibrahimi, Soumaya
Elboughdiri, Noureddine
Tekaya, Mohamed Aymen
Ghernaout, Djamel
Hannachi, Ahmed
Mesloub, Abdelhakim
Ayadi, Badreddine
Kolsi, Lioua
author_sort Gasmi, Aicha
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Pollutants derived from real textile wastewater present a high environmental risk. This work involves the study of the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, and turbidity from Tunisian real textile wastewater by two different water treatment technologies: chemical coagulation (CC) and electrocoagulation (EC). A comparative study between these two methods was conducted based on the separation performance and operating cost (OC). The effects of different operational parameters including electrolysis time (t), voltage, and pH for EC and the coagulant concentration, initial pH, and time of slow mixing (t(sm)) for CC were studied using response surface methodology. The developed quadratic models for the responses were in good agreement with the experimental data. The experiments proved the efficiency of both chemical and electrochemical techniques for the treatment of textile effluent. Indeed, by using EC, the reduction efficiencies of COD, color, and turbidity were 63.05, 99.07, and 96.31%, respectively, under optimal conditions (pH 9, t = 36.26 min, and voltage 4 V). For CC treatment, the achieved removal efficiencies of COD, color, and turbidity were 54.02, 96.21, and 93.7%, respectively, at pH 8.57, a coagulant concentration of 204.75 mg/L, and a t(sm) of 28.41 min as optimal operating conditions. The OC obtained for EC and CC was about 0.47 and 0.2 USD/m(3), respectively. Even if the OC of the EC process was higher as compared to the CC process, the treated water obtained by EC meets the Tunisian Standards (NT 106.03 and NT 09-14) for textile wastewater discharge into the environment and demonstrates a high potential for its reuse in various industrial activities. EC technology can be integrated into a wastewater management system that ensures a zero liquid discharge of wastewater into the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9260942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92609422022-07-08 Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation Gasmi, Aicha Ibrahimi, Soumaya Elboughdiri, Noureddine Tekaya, Mohamed Aymen Ghernaout, Djamel Hannachi, Ahmed Mesloub, Abdelhakim Ayadi, Badreddine Kolsi, Lioua ACS Omega [Image: see text] Pollutants derived from real textile wastewater present a high environmental risk. This work involves the study of the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, and turbidity from Tunisian real textile wastewater by two different water treatment technologies: chemical coagulation (CC) and electrocoagulation (EC). A comparative study between these two methods was conducted based on the separation performance and operating cost (OC). The effects of different operational parameters including electrolysis time (t), voltage, and pH for EC and the coagulant concentration, initial pH, and time of slow mixing (t(sm)) for CC were studied using response surface methodology. The developed quadratic models for the responses were in good agreement with the experimental data. The experiments proved the efficiency of both chemical and electrochemical techniques for the treatment of textile effluent. Indeed, by using EC, the reduction efficiencies of COD, color, and turbidity were 63.05, 99.07, and 96.31%, respectively, under optimal conditions (pH 9, t = 36.26 min, and voltage 4 V). For CC treatment, the achieved removal efficiencies of COD, color, and turbidity were 54.02, 96.21, and 93.7%, respectively, at pH 8.57, a coagulant concentration of 204.75 mg/L, and a t(sm) of 28.41 min as optimal operating conditions. The OC obtained for EC and CC was about 0.47 and 0.2 USD/m(3), respectively. Even if the OC of the EC process was higher as compared to the CC process, the treated water obtained by EC meets the Tunisian Standards (NT 106.03 and NT 09-14) for textile wastewater discharge into the environment and demonstrates a high potential for its reuse in various industrial activities. EC technology can be integrated into a wastewater management system that ensures a zero liquid discharge of wastewater into the environment. American Chemical Society 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9260942/ /pubmed/35811923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01652 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Gasmi, Aicha
Ibrahimi, Soumaya
Elboughdiri, Noureddine
Tekaya, Mohamed Aymen
Ghernaout, Djamel
Hannachi, Ahmed
Mesloub, Abdelhakim
Ayadi, Badreddine
Kolsi, Lioua
Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation
title Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation
title_full Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation
title_short Comparative Study of Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation for the Treatment of Real Textile Wastewater: Optimization and Operating Cost Estimation
title_sort comparative study of chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation for the treatment of real textile wastewater: optimization and operating cost estimation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9260942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01652
work_keys_str_mv AT gasmiaicha comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT ibrahimisoumaya comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT elboughdirinoureddine comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT tekayamohamedaymen comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT ghernaoutdjamel comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT hannachiahmed comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT mesloubabdelhakim comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT ayadibadreddine comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation
AT kolsilioua comparativestudyofchemicalcoagulationandelectrocoagulationforthetreatmentofrealtextilewastewateroptimizationandoperatingcostestimation