Cargando…
Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination
BACKGROUND: Simulation in the field of gynecological pelvic examination with educational purposes holds great potential. In the current manuscript we evaluate a 3D printed model of the female pelvis, which improves practical teaching of the gynecological pelvic examination for medical staff. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35793005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5 |
_version_ | 1784742192986718208 |
---|---|
author | Kiesel, Matthias Beyers, Inga Kalisz, Adam Wöckel, Achim Quenzer, Anne Schlaiß, Tanja Wulff, Christine Diessner, Joachim |
author_facet | Kiesel, Matthias Beyers, Inga Kalisz, Adam Wöckel, Achim Quenzer, Anne Schlaiß, Tanja Wulff, Christine Diessner, Joachim |
author_sort | Kiesel, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Simulation in the field of gynecological pelvic examination with educational purposes holds great potential. In the current manuscript we evaluate a 3D printed model of the female pelvis, which improves practical teaching of the gynecological pelvic examination for medical staff. METHODS: We evaluated the benefit of a 3D printed model of the female pelvis (Pelvisio®) as part of a seminar (“skills training”) for teaching gynecological examination to medical students. Each student was randomly assigned to Group A or B by picking a ticket from a box. Group A underwent the skills training without the 3D printed model. Group B experienced the same seminar with integration of the model. Both groups evaluated the seminar by answering five questions on Likert scales (1–10, 1 = “very little” or “very poor”, 10 equals “very much” or “very good”). Additionally, both groups answered three multiple-choice questions concerning pelvic anatomy (Question 6 to 8). Finally, Group B evaluated the 3D printed model with ten questions (Question 9 to 18, Likert scales, 1–10). RESULTS: Two of five questions concerning the students’ satisfaction with the seminar and their gained knowledge showed statistically significant better ratings in Group B (6.7 vs. 8.2 points and 8.1 vs. 8.9 points (p < 0.001 and p < 0.009). The other three questions showed no statistically significant differences between the traditional teaching setting vs. the 3D printed model (p < 0.411, p < 0.344 and p < 0.215, respectively). The overall mean score of Question 1 to 5 showed 8.4 points for Group B and 7.8 points for Group A (p < 0.001). All three multiple-choice questions, asking about female pelvic anatomy, were answered more often correctly by Group B (p < 0.001, p < 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean score from the answers to Questions 9 to 18, only answered by Group B, showed a mean of 8.6 points, indicating, that the students approved of the model. CONCLUSION: The presented 3D printed model Pelvisio® improves the education of female pelvic anatomy and examination for medical students. Hence, training this pivotal examination can be supported by a custom designed anatomical model tailored for interactive and explorative learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9261074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92610742022-07-08 Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination Kiesel, Matthias Beyers, Inga Kalisz, Adam Wöckel, Achim Quenzer, Anne Schlaiß, Tanja Wulff, Christine Diessner, Joachim 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: Simulation in the field of gynecological pelvic examination with educational purposes holds great potential. In the current manuscript we evaluate a 3D printed model of the female pelvis, which improves practical teaching of the gynecological pelvic examination for medical staff. METHODS: We evaluated the benefit of a 3D printed model of the female pelvis (Pelvisio®) as part of a seminar (“skills training”) for teaching gynecological examination to medical students. Each student was randomly assigned to Group A or B by picking a ticket from a box. Group A underwent the skills training without the 3D printed model. Group B experienced the same seminar with integration of the model. Both groups evaluated the seminar by answering five questions on Likert scales (1–10, 1 = “very little” or “very poor”, 10 equals “very much” or “very good”). Additionally, both groups answered three multiple-choice questions concerning pelvic anatomy (Question 6 to 8). Finally, Group B evaluated the 3D printed model with ten questions (Question 9 to 18, Likert scales, 1–10). RESULTS: Two of five questions concerning the students’ satisfaction with the seminar and their gained knowledge showed statistically significant better ratings in Group B (6.7 vs. 8.2 points and 8.1 vs. 8.9 points (p < 0.001 and p < 0.009). The other three questions showed no statistically significant differences between the traditional teaching setting vs. the 3D printed model (p < 0.411, p < 0.344 and p < 0.215, respectively). The overall mean score of Question 1 to 5 showed 8.4 points for Group B and 7.8 points for Group A (p < 0.001). All three multiple-choice questions, asking about female pelvic anatomy, were answered more often correctly by Group B (p < 0.001, p < 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean score from the answers to Questions 9 to 18, only answered by Group B, showed a mean of 8.6 points, indicating, that the students approved of the model. CONCLUSION: The presented 3D printed model Pelvisio® improves the education of female pelvic anatomy and examination for medical students. Hence, training this pivotal examination can be supported by a custom designed anatomical model tailored for interactive and explorative learning. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9261074/ /pubmed/35793005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kiesel, Matthias Beyers, Inga Kalisz, Adam Wöckel, Achim Quenzer, Anne Schlaiß, Tanja Wulff, Christine Diessner, Joachim Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
title | Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
title_full | Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
title_short | Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
title_sort | evaluating the value of a 3d printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35793005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kieselmatthias evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT beyersinga evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT kaliszadam evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT wockelachim evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT quenzeranne evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT schlaißtanja evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT wulffchristine evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination AT diessnerjoachim evaluatingthevalueofa3dprintedmodelforhandsontrainingofgynecologicalpelvicexamination |