Cargando…

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology

BACKGROUND: Prognostic models are used widely in the oncology domain to guide medical decision-making. Little is known about the risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning and the barriers to their clinical uptake in the oncology domain. METHODS: We conducted a systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Dhiman, Paula, Ma, Jie, Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., Speich, Benjamin, Bullock, Garrett, Damen, Johanna A. A., Hooft, Lotty, Kirtley, Shona, Riley, Richard D., Van Calster, Ben, Moons, Karel G. M., Collins, Gary S.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35794668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-022-00126-w

Ejemplares similares

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
por: Logullo, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A review found inadequate reporting of case–control studies of risk factors for pancreatic cancer
por: MacCarthy, Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
por: Wynants, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting guideline checklists are not quality evaluation forms: they are guidance for writing
por: Logullo, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology: hardly any improvement since 1950
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research
por: MacCarthy, Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
por: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical trial registration was associated with lower risk of bias compared with non-registered trials among trials included in systematic reviews
por: Lindsley, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Dementia prediction in the general population using clinically accessible variables: a proof-of-concept study using machine learning. The AGES-Reykjavik study
por: Twait, Emma L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use
por: Logullo, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of “unclear” Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Rademaker, Maaike M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, W Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: a systematic review protocol
por: Gerry, Stephen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review
por: Hudda, Mohammed T., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: systematic review and critical appraisal of methodology
por: Gerry, Stephen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting guidelines: tools to increase the completeness and transparency of your anesthesiology research paper
por: Quintão, Vinícius Caldeira, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A new community for those involved and interested in diagnosis and prognosis
por: Moons, Karel G. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
por: Van Calster, Ben, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols
por: van der Braak, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_drbgj01isauji6g5ejh9fjk7vt