Cargando…
Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors
BACKGROUND: The devastating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic seemed not yet to cease. Numerous studies regarding its typical sign and symptoms have been done, presenting one of the most promising predictors of the infection: olfactory dysfunction. Although not life-threatening, the symptom co...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261196/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-022-00271-5 |
_version_ | 1784742219634180096 |
---|---|
author | Utomo, Nunki Puspita Iswarini, Arin Dwi |
author_facet | Utomo, Nunki Puspita Iswarini, Arin Dwi |
author_sort | Utomo, Nunki Puspita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The devastating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic seemed not yet to cease. Numerous studies regarding its typical sign and symptoms have been done, presenting one of the most promising predictors of the infection: olfactory dysfunction. Although not life-threatening, the symptom could decrease one’s quality of life, especially if persistent throughout their entire life. Among the countless literature regarding loss of smell, only limited studies denote predictors of smell recovery. This systematic review aimed to bridge the knowledge gap of olfactory impairment prevalence and recovery predictors in people with COVID-19. METHODS: This review was carried out through journal databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and medRxiv. Literature published from 2020 to 2022 that complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria was retrieved, scanned for duplicates with Zotero, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 2243 studies, seven were assessed with the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) to analyze the risk of bias, which five cohort studies deemed relevant. Olfactory dysfunction, olfactory recovery, and its predictive factors are noted. This review is registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number CRD42022318412). CONCLUSIONS: No clinical markers predicted the recovery of olfactory dysfunction, but patients who are more likely to recover are associated with younger age, female sex, and having COVID-19-related symptoms such as nasal congestion and trigeminal sensation. Modifiable factors are still dubious in predicting the olfaction recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9261196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92611962022-07-07 Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors Utomo, Nunki Puspita Iswarini, Arin Dwi Egypt J Otolaryngol Review Article BACKGROUND: The devastating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic seemed not yet to cease. Numerous studies regarding its typical sign and symptoms have been done, presenting one of the most promising predictors of the infection: olfactory dysfunction. Although not life-threatening, the symptom could decrease one’s quality of life, especially if persistent throughout their entire life. Among the countless literature regarding loss of smell, only limited studies denote predictors of smell recovery. This systematic review aimed to bridge the knowledge gap of olfactory impairment prevalence and recovery predictors in people with COVID-19. METHODS: This review was carried out through journal databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and medRxiv. Literature published from 2020 to 2022 that complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria was retrieved, scanned for duplicates with Zotero, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 2243 studies, seven were assessed with the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) to analyze the risk of bias, which five cohort studies deemed relevant. Olfactory dysfunction, olfactory recovery, and its predictive factors are noted. This review is registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number CRD42022318412). CONCLUSIONS: No clinical markers predicted the recovery of olfactory dysfunction, but patients who are more likely to recover are associated with younger age, female sex, and having COVID-19-related symptoms such as nasal congestion and trigeminal sensation. Modifiable factors are still dubious in predicting the olfaction recovery. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9261196/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-022-00271-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Utomo, Nunki Puspita Iswarini, Arin Dwi Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
title | Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
title_full | Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
title_fullStr | Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
title_short | Impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
title_sort | impaired olfaction post-coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of smell recovery predictive factors |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261196/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-022-00271-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT utomonunkipuspita impairedolfactionpostcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewofsmellrecoverypredictivefactors AT iswariniarindwi impairedolfactionpostcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewofsmellrecoverypredictivefactors |