Cargando…

Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study

INTRODUCTION: Gynaecomastia is the commonest male breast condition accounting for approximately 85% of male breast lesions. There is minimal information on the immunohistochemical profile of gynaecomastia. We aimed to comprehensively profile a large series of gynaecomastia samples for putative mamma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasad, Prakruthi, Bennett, Aneliese, Speirs, Val, Shaaban, Abeer M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.875839
_version_ 1784742282742726656
author Prasad, Prakruthi
Bennett, Aneliese
Speirs, Val
Shaaban, Abeer M.
author_facet Prasad, Prakruthi
Bennett, Aneliese
Speirs, Val
Shaaban, Abeer M.
author_sort Prasad, Prakruthi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Gynaecomastia is the commonest male breast condition accounting for approximately 85% of male breast lesions. There is minimal information on the immunohistochemical profile of gynaecomastia. We aimed to comprehensively profile a large series of gynaecomastia samples for putative mammary diagnostic, predictive and prognostic markers. METHODS: A total of 156 samples, were histologically reviewed, assembled onto tissue microarrays, and stained for oestrogen receptors (ERα, ERβ1, ERß2), progesterone receptors (total PR, PRα), androgen receptor (AR), basal & luminal cytokeratins (CK5/6, CK14, CK8/18) and the proliferation marker Ki67. Relevant cut offs for marker positivity were defined based on existing literature: AR (10%), ERα and PR (Allred score >3/8), ERß (10% and 20%), cytokeratins (10%) and Ki67 (10% and 20%). RESULTS: 108 samples from 86 patients aged 13-75 years were available for immunohistochemical assessment. 73.1% of the lesions were AR positive, compared to 99% for ERα and 100% for both ERß1 and ERß2. 98% of samples were positive for total PR and 97.1% for PRα. 69.8% expressed CK5/6 whilst 57% were CK14 positive. A tri-layered pattern of cytokeratin expression was also observed. Ki67 positivity was low with 17.1% and 6.7% classified as Ki67 positive using 10% and 20% cut off values respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between ERα expression and patient age (rs = -0.221, p=0.023). Bivariate correlations were produced, and comparisons made with previously published data regarding the immunohistochemical status in normal female breast tissue, proliferative and neoplastic breast diseases of the female and male breast. CONCLUSIONS: Hormone receptors, including oestrogen receptor α and ß isoforms as well as androgen receptors were abundantly expressed within the intraductal luminal hyperplastic epithelium in gynaecomastia supporting the hormonal role in the pathogenesis and treatment. ERα, ERβ1 and ERβ2 were expressed in a higher proportion of cells compared with their expression in the female breast benign lesions which further characterises gynaecomastia biology. The identification of a low Ki67 proliferative index and the mixed cytokeratin profile in gynaecomastia differentiates this benign condition from male breast cancer. Therefore, Ki67 and cytokeratins can help in the differential diagnosis from histological mimics in the routine diagnostic work up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9261459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92614592022-07-08 Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study Prasad, Prakruthi Bennett, Aneliese Speirs, Val Shaaban, Abeer M. Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Gynaecomastia is the commonest male breast condition accounting for approximately 85% of male breast lesions. There is minimal information on the immunohistochemical profile of gynaecomastia. We aimed to comprehensively profile a large series of gynaecomastia samples for putative mammary diagnostic, predictive and prognostic markers. METHODS: A total of 156 samples, were histologically reviewed, assembled onto tissue microarrays, and stained for oestrogen receptors (ERα, ERβ1, ERß2), progesterone receptors (total PR, PRα), androgen receptor (AR), basal & luminal cytokeratins (CK5/6, CK14, CK8/18) and the proliferation marker Ki67. Relevant cut offs for marker positivity were defined based on existing literature: AR (10%), ERα and PR (Allred score >3/8), ERß (10% and 20%), cytokeratins (10%) and Ki67 (10% and 20%). RESULTS: 108 samples from 86 patients aged 13-75 years were available for immunohistochemical assessment. 73.1% of the lesions were AR positive, compared to 99% for ERα and 100% for both ERß1 and ERß2. 98% of samples were positive for total PR and 97.1% for PRα. 69.8% expressed CK5/6 whilst 57% were CK14 positive. A tri-layered pattern of cytokeratin expression was also observed. Ki67 positivity was low with 17.1% and 6.7% classified as Ki67 positive using 10% and 20% cut off values respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between ERα expression and patient age (rs = -0.221, p=0.023). Bivariate correlations were produced, and comparisons made with previously published data regarding the immunohistochemical status in normal female breast tissue, proliferative and neoplastic breast diseases of the female and male breast. CONCLUSIONS: Hormone receptors, including oestrogen receptor α and ß isoforms as well as androgen receptors were abundantly expressed within the intraductal luminal hyperplastic epithelium in gynaecomastia supporting the hormonal role in the pathogenesis and treatment. ERα, ERβ1 and ERβ2 were expressed in a higher proportion of cells compared with their expression in the female breast benign lesions which further characterises gynaecomastia biology. The identification of a low Ki67 proliferative index and the mixed cytokeratin profile in gynaecomastia differentiates this benign condition from male breast cancer. Therefore, Ki67 and cytokeratins can help in the differential diagnosis from histological mimics in the routine diagnostic work up. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9261459/ /pubmed/35814372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.875839 Text en Copyright © 2022 Prasad, Bennett, Speirs and Shaaban https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Prasad, Prakruthi
Bennett, Aneliese
Speirs, Val
Shaaban, Abeer M.
Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study
title Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study
title_full Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study
title_fullStr Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study
title_full_unstemmed Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study
title_short Morphological Features and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Male Breast Gynaecomastia; A Large Tissue Microarray Study
title_sort morphological features and immunohistochemical profiling of male breast gynaecomastia; a large tissue microarray study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.875839
work_keys_str_mv AT prasadprakruthi morphologicalfeaturesandimmunohistochemicalprofilingofmalebreastgynaecomastiaalargetissuemicroarraystudy
AT bennettaneliese morphologicalfeaturesandimmunohistochemicalprofilingofmalebreastgynaecomastiaalargetissuemicroarraystudy
AT speirsval morphologicalfeaturesandimmunohistochemicalprofilingofmalebreastgynaecomastiaalargetissuemicroarraystudy
AT shaabanabeerm morphologicalfeaturesandimmunohistochemicalprofilingofmalebreastgynaecomastiaalargetissuemicroarraystudy