Cargando…

Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations

BACKGROUND: Polyphenol-rich fruit supplements are commonly consumed by recreationally active and athletic populations because of their proposed benefits to both exercise performance and recovery from prior exercise. While it has been proposed that 300 mg of polyphenols pre-exercise enhances performa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rickards, Lee, Lynn, Anthony, Barker, Margo E., Russell, Mark, Ranchordas, Mayur K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2022.2091412
_version_ 1784742344290992128
author Rickards, Lee
Lynn, Anthony
Barker, Margo E.
Russell, Mark
Ranchordas, Mayur K.
author_facet Rickards, Lee
Lynn, Anthony
Barker, Margo E.
Russell, Mark
Ranchordas, Mayur K.
author_sort Rickards, Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polyphenol-rich fruit supplements are commonly consumed by recreationally active and athletic populations because of their proposed benefits to both exercise performance and recovery from prior exercise. While it has been proposed that 300 mg of polyphenols pre-exercise enhances performance and 1000 mg per day accelerates recovery from muscle damage, it is difficult for consumers to optimize their intake because the polyphenol content of most fruit supplements is not available. Therefore, this study aimed to profile the phenolic and anthocyanin content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of a range of polyphenol-rich fruit supplements on sale in the UK. METHODS: Ten polyphenol-rich fruit supplements (six cherry, two pomegranate, one blueberry, and one New Zealand blackcurrant) commonly consumed by athletes were analyzed for total phenols (Folin–Ciocalteu method), total anthocyanins (pH differential method), and in vitro antioxidant capacity (ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). RESULTS: The ten tested supplements varied markedly per serving in total phenolics (range: 13.8–1007.3 mg/gallic acid equivalents), anthocyanin content (range: 0.19–40.52 mg/cyanidin-3-glucoside), ORAC (range: 150–10,072 µmol of trolox equivalents), and FRAP (range: 72−14,320 µmol of Fe2+ equivalents). Different brands of tart cherry concentrate also exhibited a marked variation in their content of total phenolics (208–591 mg/GAE), anthocyanins (1.5–23.7 mg/cyd-3-glu), and antioxidant capacity (FRAP: 1724–4489 µmol of Fe2+ equivalents; ORAC: 6015–10,072 µmol of TE per serving) per serving. CONCLUSION: As expected, supplements based on different fruits contained different quantities of anthocyanins and polyphenols. However, there was also a substantial variation within different brands of tart cherry supplements. Because limited compositional information is available on the labels of most fruit-based supplements, the data in this article will enable consumers to select the required volume of the ten tested supplements to meet suggested recommendations for polyphenol intake to enhance performance (300 mg pre-exercise) and accelerate recovery (1000 mg per day) from prior exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9261743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92617432022-07-08 Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations Rickards, Lee Lynn, Anthony Barker, Margo E. Russell, Mark Ranchordas, Mayur K. J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: Polyphenol-rich fruit supplements are commonly consumed by recreationally active and athletic populations because of their proposed benefits to both exercise performance and recovery from prior exercise. While it has been proposed that 300 mg of polyphenols pre-exercise enhances performance and 1000 mg per day accelerates recovery from muscle damage, it is difficult for consumers to optimize their intake because the polyphenol content of most fruit supplements is not available. Therefore, this study aimed to profile the phenolic and anthocyanin content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of a range of polyphenol-rich fruit supplements on sale in the UK. METHODS: Ten polyphenol-rich fruit supplements (six cherry, two pomegranate, one blueberry, and one New Zealand blackcurrant) commonly consumed by athletes were analyzed for total phenols (Folin–Ciocalteu method), total anthocyanins (pH differential method), and in vitro antioxidant capacity (ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). RESULTS: The ten tested supplements varied markedly per serving in total phenolics (range: 13.8–1007.3 mg/gallic acid equivalents), anthocyanin content (range: 0.19–40.52 mg/cyanidin-3-glucoside), ORAC (range: 150–10,072 µmol of trolox equivalents), and FRAP (range: 72−14,320 µmol of Fe2+ equivalents). Different brands of tart cherry concentrate also exhibited a marked variation in their content of total phenolics (208–591 mg/GAE), anthocyanins (1.5–23.7 mg/cyd-3-glu), and antioxidant capacity (FRAP: 1724–4489 µmol of Fe2+ equivalents; ORAC: 6015–10,072 µmol of TE per serving) per serving. CONCLUSION: As expected, supplements based on different fruits contained different quantities of anthocyanins and polyphenols. However, there was also a substantial variation within different brands of tart cherry supplements. Because limited compositional information is available on the labels of most fruit-based supplements, the data in this article will enable consumers to select the required volume of the ten tested supplements to meet suggested recommendations for polyphenol intake to enhance performance (300 mg pre-exercise) and accelerate recovery (1000 mg per day) from prior exercise. Routledge 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9261743/ /pubmed/35813849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2022.2091412 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rickards, Lee
Lynn, Anthony
Barker, Margo E.
Russell, Mark
Ranchordas, Mayur K.
Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
title Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
title_full Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
title_fullStr Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
title_short Comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
title_sort comparison of the polyphenol content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of fruit-based nutritional supplements commonly consumed by athletic and recreationally active populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2022.2091412
work_keys_str_mv AT rickardslee comparisonofthepolyphenolcontentandinvitroantioxidantcapacityoffruitbasednutritionalsupplementscommonlyconsumedbyathleticandrecreationallyactivepopulations
AT lynnanthony comparisonofthepolyphenolcontentandinvitroantioxidantcapacityoffruitbasednutritionalsupplementscommonlyconsumedbyathleticandrecreationallyactivepopulations
AT barkermargoe comparisonofthepolyphenolcontentandinvitroantioxidantcapacityoffruitbasednutritionalsupplementscommonlyconsumedbyathleticandrecreationallyactivepopulations
AT russellmark comparisonofthepolyphenolcontentandinvitroantioxidantcapacityoffruitbasednutritionalsupplementscommonlyconsumedbyathleticandrecreationallyactivepopulations
AT ranchordasmayurk comparisonofthepolyphenolcontentandinvitroantioxidantcapacityoffruitbasednutritionalsupplementscommonlyconsumedbyathleticandrecreationallyactivepopulations