Cargando…

Rapid identification of nicotine in electronic cigarette liquids based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering

Nicotine-containing electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) is prohibited in many countries, creating requirements for rapid detection approaches for on-site inspection or screening for large amounts of samples. Here, we demonstrate a simple way to identify nicotine using surface-enhanced Raman scatt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chien, Jun-Yi, Gu, Yong-Chun, Tsai, Hsin-Mei, Liu, Chun-Hao, Yen, Chia-Yuan, Wang, Yuh-Lin, Wang, Juen-Kai, Lin, Chi-Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taiwan Food and Drug Administration 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696111
http://dx.doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.1064
Descripción
Sumario:Nicotine-containing electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) is prohibited in many countries, creating requirements for rapid detection approaches for on-site inspection or screening for large amounts of samples. Here, we demonstrate a simple way to identify nicotine using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) with substrates made of silver nanoparticle arrays imbedded in anodic aluminum oxide nanochannels (Ag/AAO). Compared with the reported colloidal nanoparticle-based SERS, that required serial dilutions to enable colloid aggregation in the viscous e-liquid, a small amount of undiluted e-liquid sample can be directly added onto our solid-phase Ag/AAO substrate without any pre-treatment. The sensitivity of our SERS measurements is 2–3 orders of magnitude higher than that required for identification of nicotine in e-liquid, which is typically around 1000–18,000 ppm. Using such nanoparticle array-based SERS, we have tested 22 commercially available e-liquid products, using the corresponding gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) reports as the reference. The SERS measurements were done within one hour and successfully identified 20 samples. Only 2 samples showed SERS interference from ingredients that were not suitable for SERS analysis.