Cargando…

Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment

PURPOSE: We demonstrated real-time evaluation technology for cataract surgery using artificial intelligence (AI) to residents and supervising doctors (doctors), and performed a comparison between the two groups in terms of risk indicators and duration for two of the important processes of surgery, c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabuchi, Hitoshi, Morita, Shoji, Miki, Masayuki, Deguchi, Hodaka, Kamiura, Naotake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813791
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_5_22
_version_ 1784742407914389504
author Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Morita, Shoji
Miki, Masayuki
Deguchi, Hodaka
Kamiura, Naotake
author_facet Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Morita, Shoji
Miki, Masayuki
Deguchi, Hodaka
Kamiura, Naotake
author_sort Tabuchi, Hitoshi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We demonstrated real-time evaluation technology for cataract surgery using artificial intelligence (AI) to residents and supervising doctors (doctors), and performed a comparison between the two groups in terms of risk indicators and duration for two of the important processes of surgery, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) and phacoemulsification (Phaco). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of three residents with operative experience of fewer than 100 cases, and three supervising doctors with operative experience of 1000 or more cases, performed cataract surgeries on three cases, respectably, a total of 18 cases. The mean values of the risk indicators in the CCC and Phaco processes measured in real-time during the surgery were statistically compared between the residents’ group and the doctors’ group. RESULTS: The mean values (standard deviation) of the risk indicator (the safest, 0 to most risky, 1) for CCC were 0.556 (0.384) in the residents and 0.433 (0.421) in the doctors, those for Phaco were 0.511 (0.423) in the residents and 0.377 (0.406) in the doctors. The doctors’ risk indicators were significantly better in both processes (P = 0.0003, P < 0.0001 by Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented a real-time surgical technique evaluation system for cataract surgery and collected data. The risk indicators were significantly better in the doctors than in the resident's group, suggesting that AI can objectively serve as a new indicator to intraoperatively identify surgical risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9262019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92620192022-07-08 Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment Tabuchi, Hitoshi Morita, Shoji Miki, Masayuki Deguchi, Hodaka Kamiura, Naotake Taiwan J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: We demonstrated real-time evaluation technology for cataract surgery using artificial intelligence (AI) to residents and supervising doctors (doctors), and performed a comparison between the two groups in terms of risk indicators and duration for two of the important processes of surgery, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) and phacoemulsification (Phaco). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of three residents with operative experience of fewer than 100 cases, and three supervising doctors with operative experience of 1000 or more cases, performed cataract surgeries on three cases, respectably, a total of 18 cases. The mean values of the risk indicators in the CCC and Phaco processes measured in real-time during the surgery were statistically compared between the residents’ group and the doctors’ group. RESULTS: The mean values (standard deviation) of the risk indicator (the safest, 0 to most risky, 1) for CCC were 0.556 (0.384) in the residents and 0.433 (0.421) in the doctors, those for Phaco were 0.511 (0.423) in the residents and 0.377 (0.406) in the doctors. The doctors’ risk indicators were significantly better in both processes (P = 0.0003, P < 0.0001 by Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented a real-time surgical technique evaluation system for cataract surgery and collected data. The risk indicators were significantly better in the doctors than in the resident's group, suggesting that AI can objectively serve as a new indicator to intraoperatively identify surgical risks. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9262019/ /pubmed/35813791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_5_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Taiwan J Ophthalmol https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Morita, Shoji
Miki, Masayuki
Deguchi, Hodaka
Kamiura, Naotake
Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment
title Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment
title_full Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment
title_fullStr Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment
title_full_unstemmed Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment
title_short Real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: A preliminary study on demonstration experiment
title_sort real-time artificial intelligence evaluation of cataract surgery: a preliminary study on demonstration experiment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813791
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_5_22
work_keys_str_mv AT tabuchihitoshi realtimeartificialintelligenceevaluationofcataractsurgeryapreliminarystudyondemonstrationexperiment
AT moritashoji realtimeartificialintelligenceevaluationofcataractsurgeryapreliminarystudyondemonstrationexperiment
AT mikimasayuki realtimeartificialintelligenceevaluationofcataractsurgeryapreliminarystudyondemonstrationexperiment
AT deguchihodaka realtimeartificialintelligenceevaluationofcataractsurgeryapreliminarystudyondemonstrationexperiment
AT kamiuranaotake realtimeartificialintelligenceevaluationofcataractsurgeryapreliminarystudyondemonstrationexperiment