Cargando…
Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the most accurate formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation among five currently used formulas in eyes with phacomorphic glaucoma (PG) undergoing cataract extraction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective interventional case...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813804 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_1_22 |
_version_ | 1784742410723524608 |
---|---|
author | Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Samadi, Melika Soleimani, Mohammad Fonoodi, Hosein Ghods, Sepideh Inanloo, Bahman |
author_facet | Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Samadi, Melika Soleimani, Mohammad Fonoodi, Hosein Ghods, Sepideh Inanloo, Bahman |
author_sort | Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the most accurate formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation among five currently used formulas in eyes with phacomorphic glaucoma (PG) undergoing cataract extraction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series Patients diagnosed with PG were undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. After 3 months, the refractive outcome for each formula was evaluated with mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the percentages of eyes within 0.25 D and 0.5 D of predicted error. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed the study. PEs were significantly different among the 5 formulas (P = 0.019), and Holladay I had the least error (−0.02 ± 1.11). Haigis formula had the highest hyperopic shift (0.37 ± 1.22), highest MAE (0.99 ± 0.78) and the lowest percentages of desired PEs, while the SRK II produced the greatest percentages. The overall differences in MAE between the 5 formulas were statistically insignificant (P = 0.547). CONCLUSION: In some extreme situations like patients with PG, lower generation of IOL power calculation formulas may still produce more acceptable refractive outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9262030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92620302022-07-08 Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Samadi, Melika Soleimani, Mohammad Fonoodi, Hosein Ghods, Sepideh Inanloo, Bahman Taiwan J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the most accurate formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation among five currently used formulas in eyes with phacomorphic glaucoma (PG) undergoing cataract extraction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series Patients diagnosed with PG were undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. After 3 months, the refractive outcome for each formula was evaluated with mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the percentages of eyes within 0.25 D and 0.5 D of predicted error. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed the study. PEs were significantly different among the 5 formulas (P = 0.019), and Holladay I had the least error (−0.02 ± 1.11). Haigis formula had the highest hyperopic shift (0.37 ± 1.22), highest MAE (0.99 ± 0.78) and the lowest percentages of desired PEs, while the SRK II produced the greatest percentages. The overall differences in MAE between the 5 formulas were statistically insignificant (P = 0.547). CONCLUSION: In some extreme situations like patients with PG, lower generation of IOL power calculation formulas may still produce more acceptable refractive outcomes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9262030/ /pubmed/35813804 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_1_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Taiwan J Ophthalmol https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Samadi, Melika Soleimani, Mohammad Fonoodi, Hosein Ghods, Sepideh Inanloo, Bahman Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
title | Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
title_full | Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
title_short | Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
title_sort | accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813804 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_1_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabatabaeiseyedali accuracyofdifferentlenspowercalculationformulasinpatientswithphacomorphicglaucoma AT samadimelika accuracyofdifferentlenspowercalculationformulasinpatientswithphacomorphicglaucoma AT soleimanimohammad accuracyofdifferentlenspowercalculationformulasinpatientswithphacomorphicglaucoma AT fonoodihosein accuracyofdifferentlenspowercalculationformulasinpatientswithphacomorphicglaucoma AT ghodssepideh accuracyofdifferentlenspowercalculationformulasinpatientswithphacomorphicglaucoma AT inanloobahman accuracyofdifferentlenspowercalculationformulasinpatientswithphacomorphicglaucoma |