Cargando…
Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images
Wavelet transform (WT) is a commonly used method for noise suppression and feature extraction from biomedical images. The selection of WT system settings significantly affects the efficiency of denoising procedure. This comparative study analyzed the efficacy of the proposed WT system on real 292 ul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35797331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270745 |
_version_ | 1784742451258327040 |
---|---|
author | Vilimek, Dominik Kubicek, Jan Golian, Milos Jaros, Rene Kahankova, Radana Hanzlikova, Pavla Barvik, Daniel Krestanova, Alice Penhaker, Marek Cerny, Martin Prokop, Ondrej Buzga, Marek |
author_facet | Vilimek, Dominik Kubicek, Jan Golian, Milos Jaros, Rene Kahankova, Radana Hanzlikova, Pavla Barvik, Daniel Krestanova, Alice Penhaker, Marek Cerny, Martin Prokop, Ondrej Buzga, Marek |
author_sort | Vilimek, Dominik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wavelet transform (WT) is a commonly used method for noise suppression and feature extraction from biomedical images. The selection of WT system settings significantly affects the efficiency of denoising procedure. This comparative study analyzed the efficacy of the proposed WT system on real 292 ultrasound images from several areas of interest. The study investigates the performance of the system for different scaling functions of two basic wavelet bases, Daubechies and Symlets, and their efficiency on images artificially corrupted by three kinds of noise. To evaluate our extensive analysis, we used objective metrics, namely structural similarity index (SSIM), correlation coefficient, mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and universal image quality index (Q-index). Moreover, this study includes clinical insights on selected filtration outcomes provided by clinical experts. The results show that the efficiency of the filtration strongly depends on the specific wavelet system setting, type of ultrasound data, and the noise present. The findings presented may provide a useful guideline for researchers, software developers, and clinical professionals to obtain high quality images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9262246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92622462022-07-08 Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images Vilimek, Dominik Kubicek, Jan Golian, Milos Jaros, Rene Kahankova, Radana Hanzlikova, Pavla Barvik, Daniel Krestanova, Alice Penhaker, Marek Cerny, Martin Prokop, Ondrej Buzga, Marek PLoS One Research Article Wavelet transform (WT) is a commonly used method for noise suppression and feature extraction from biomedical images. The selection of WT system settings significantly affects the efficiency of denoising procedure. This comparative study analyzed the efficacy of the proposed WT system on real 292 ultrasound images from several areas of interest. The study investigates the performance of the system for different scaling functions of two basic wavelet bases, Daubechies and Symlets, and their efficiency on images artificially corrupted by three kinds of noise. To evaluate our extensive analysis, we used objective metrics, namely structural similarity index (SSIM), correlation coefficient, mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and universal image quality index (Q-index). Moreover, this study includes clinical insights on selected filtration outcomes provided by clinical experts. The results show that the efficiency of the filtration strongly depends on the specific wavelet system setting, type of ultrasound data, and the noise present. The findings presented may provide a useful guideline for researchers, software developers, and clinical professionals to obtain high quality images. Public Library of Science 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9262246/ /pubmed/35797331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270745 Text en © 2022 Vilimek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vilimek, Dominik Kubicek, Jan Golian, Milos Jaros, Rene Kahankova, Radana Hanzlikova, Pavla Barvik, Daniel Krestanova, Alice Penhaker, Marek Cerny, Martin Prokop, Ondrej Buzga, Marek Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
title | Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
title_full | Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
title_short | Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
title_sort | comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35797331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vilimekdominik comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT kubicekjan comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT golianmilos comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT jarosrene comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT kahankovaradana comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT hanzlikovapavla comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT barvikdaniel comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT krestanovaalice comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT penhakermarek comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT cernymartin comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT prokopondrej comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages AT buzgamarek comparativeanalysisofwavelettransformfilteringsystemsfornoisereductioninultrasoundimages |