Cargando…

Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women

BACKGROUND: Sexual minority women (SMW) are at greater risk for heavy episodic drinking, frequent marijuana use, and tobacco use than heterosexual women. Because past research has suggested the political and social environment may influence disparities in substance use by sexual orientation, this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drabble, Laurie A., Munroe, Cat, Mericle, Amy A., Zollweg, Sarah, Trocki, Karen F., Karriker-Jaffe, Katherine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100058
_version_ 1784742470828949504
author Drabble, Laurie A.
Munroe, Cat
Mericle, Amy A.
Zollweg, Sarah
Trocki, Karen F.
Karriker-Jaffe, Katherine J.
author_facet Drabble, Laurie A.
Munroe, Cat
Mericle, Amy A.
Zollweg, Sarah
Trocki, Karen F.
Karriker-Jaffe, Katherine J.
author_sort Drabble, Laurie A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sexual minority women (SMW) are at greater risk for heavy episodic drinking, frequent marijuana use, and tobacco use than heterosexual women. Because past research has suggested the political and social environment may influence disparities in substance use by sexual orientation, this study examined associations of the U.S. state-level policy environment on substance use by SMW. METHODS: A total of 732 SMW participants were recruited from two national online panels: a general population panel (n = 333) and a sexual minority-specific panel (n = 399). Past year substance use was defined by number of days of heavy episodic drinking (HED; 4+ drinks in a day), weekly tobacco use (once a week or more vs. less or none), and weekly marijuana use (once a week or more vs. less or none). Comprehensive state policy protection was defined by enactment of five policies protecting rights of sexual minorities. Regression models compared substance use outcomes for SMW living in states with comprehensive policy protections to SMW living in states with fewer or no protections. Models also assessed the impact of state policies related to alcohol (state monopoly on alcohol wholesale or retail sales), tobacco (state enactment of comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws) and marijuana (legalization of purchase, possession, or consumption of marijuana for recreational use). RESULTS: Comprehensive policy protections were associated with fewer HED days. Recreational marijuana legalization was associated with higher odds of weekly use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings underscore the importance of policy protections for sexual minorities in reducing substance use, particularly HED, among SMW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9262325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92623252022-07-07 Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women Drabble, Laurie A. Munroe, Cat Mericle, Amy A. Zollweg, Sarah Trocki, Karen F. Karriker-Jaffe, Katherine J. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep Full Length Report BACKGROUND: Sexual minority women (SMW) are at greater risk for heavy episodic drinking, frequent marijuana use, and tobacco use than heterosexual women. Because past research has suggested the political and social environment may influence disparities in substance use by sexual orientation, this study examined associations of the U.S. state-level policy environment on substance use by SMW. METHODS: A total of 732 SMW participants were recruited from two national online panels: a general population panel (n = 333) and a sexual minority-specific panel (n = 399). Past year substance use was defined by number of days of heavy episodic drinking (HED; 4+ drinks in a day), weekly tobacco use (once a week or more vs. less or none), and weekly marijuana use (once a week or more vs. less or none). Comprehensive state policy protection was defined by enactment of five policies protecting rights of sexual minorities. Regression models compared substance use outcomes for SMW living in states with comprehensive policy protections to SMW living in states with fewer or no protections. Models also assessed the impact of state policies related to alcohol (state monopoly on alcohol wholesale or retail sales), tobacco (state enactment of comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws) and marijuana (legalization of purchase, possession, or consumption of marijuana for recreational use). RESULTS: Comprehensive policy protections were associated with fewer HED days. Recreational marijuana legalization was associated with higher odds of weekly use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings underscore the importance of policy protections for sexual minorities in reducing substance use, particularly HED, among SMW. Elsevier 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9262325/ /pubmed/35813352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100058 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Report
Drabble, Laurie A.
Munroe, Cat
Mericle, Amy A.
Zollweg, Sarah
Trocki, Karen F.
Karriker-Jaffe, Katherine J.
Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
title Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
title_full Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
title_fullStr Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
title_short Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
title_sort impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women
topic Full Length Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100058
work_keys_str_mv AT drabblelauriea impactofthepolicyenvironmentonsubstanceuseamongsexualminoritywomen
AT munroecat impactofthepolicyenvironmentonsubstanceuseamongsexualminoritywomen
AT mericleamya impactofthepolicyenvironmentonsubstanceuseamongsexualminoritywomen
AT zollwegsarah impactofthepolicyenvironmentonsubstanceuseamongsexualminoritywomen
AT trockikarenf impactofthepolicyenvironmentonsubstanceuseamongsexualminoritywomen
AT karrikerjaffekatherinej impactofthepolicyenvironmentonsubstanceuseamongsexualminoritywomen