Cargando…

Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To investigated the association between serum total testosterone and Gleason score upgrading of low-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify eligible studies publis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gan, Shu, Liu, Jian, Chen, Zhiqiang, Xiang, Songtao, Gu, Chiming, Li, Siyi, Wang, Shusheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35670005
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210459
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To investigated the association between serum total testosterone and Gleason score upgrading of low-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify eligible studies published before October 2021. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random or fixed effects models. RESULTS: Five studies comprising 1,203 low-risk prostate cancer patients were included. The results showed that low serum total testosterone (<300 ng/dL) is associated with a high rate of Gleason score upgrading after RP (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.38–3.83; p<0.001; I(2), 92.2%). Notably, sensitivity and meta-regression analyses further strengthen the reliability of our results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the idea that low serum total testosterone is associated with a high rate of Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients after RP. It is beneficial for urologist to ensure close monitoring of prostate-specific antigen levels and imaging examination when choosing non-RP treatment for low-risk prostate cancer patients.