Cargando…
Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before aut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01701-x |
_version_ | 1784742565114806272 |
---|---|
author | Frietsch, Jochen J. Miethke, Jenny Linke, Paul Crodel, Carl C. Schnetzke, Ulf Scholl, Sebastian Hochhaus, Andreas Hilgendorf, Inken |
author_facet | Frietsch, Jochen J. Miethke, Jenny Linke, Paul Crodel, Carl C. Schnetzke, Ulf Scholl, Sebastian Hochhaus, Andreas Hilgendorf, Inken |
author_sort | Frietsch, Jochen J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Treo/Flu in comparison to TEAM. Fifty-seven patients with NHL received auto-HSCT after conditioning with either Treo/Flu (n = 22) or TEAM (n = 35). All patients achieved sustained engraftment. PFS, EFS and OS were not significant in both groups. Of note is that patients in the Treo/Flu group were less dependent on thrombocyte transfusions (p = 0.0082), significantly older (in median 11 years, p < 0.0001) and suffered less frequently from infectious complications (p = 0.0105), mucositis and stomatitis (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to present efficacy, feasibility, and safety of conditioning with Treo/Flu preceding auto-HSCT in patients with NHL. Since it demonstrated a lack of significant difference in comparison to TEAM conditioning it might be a valuable alternative especially in elderly patients with B-cell NHL and comorbidities. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9262709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92627092022-07-09 Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Frietsch, Jochen J. Miethke, Jenny Linke, Paul Crodel, Carl C. Schnetzke, Ulf Scholl, Sebastian Hochhaus, Andreas Hilgendorf, Inken Bone Marrow Transplant Article Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Treo/Flu in comparison to TEAM. Fifty-seven patients with NHL received auto-HSCT after conditioning with either Treo/Flu (n = 22) or TEAM (n = 35). All patients achieved sustained engraftment. PFS, EFS and OS were not significant in both groups. Of note is that patients in the Treo/Flu group were less dependent on thrombocyte transfusions (p = 0.0082), significantly older (in median 11 years, p < 0.0001) and suffered less frequently from infectious complications (p = 0.0105), mucositis and stomatitis (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to present efficacy, feasibility, and safety of conditioning with Treo/Flu preceding auto-HSCT in patients with NHL. Since it demonstrated a lack of significant difference in comparison to TEAM conditioning it might be a valuable alternative especially in elderly patients with B-cell NHL and comorbidities. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9262709/ /pubmed/35538141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01701-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Frietsch, Jochen J. Miethke, Jenny Linke, Paul Crodel, Carl C. Schnetzke, Ulf Scholl, Sebastian Hochhaus, Andreas Hilgendorf, Inken Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title | Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_full | Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_short | Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_sort | treosulfan plus fludarabine versus team as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for b-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01701-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frietschjochenj treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT miethkejenny treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT linkepaul treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT crodelcarlc treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT schnetzkeulf treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT schollsebastian treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT hochhausandreas treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma AT hilgendorfinken treosulfanplusfludarabineversusteamasconditioningtreatmentbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforbcellnonhodgkinlymphoma |