Cargando…

Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly diagnosed in individuals aged < 50 years, resulting in advocacy of screening from age 45 years. Despite existing knowledge associating CRC with conventional adenomas, the significance of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) on the burden of CRC is less...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lall, Vidit, Ismail, Ali Galalah Mostafa, Ayonrinde, Oyekoya Taiwo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35660947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04191-x
_version_ 1784742581753610240
author Lall, Vidit
Ismail, Ali Galalah Mostafa
Ayonrinde, Oyekoya Taiwo
author_facet Lall, Vidit
Ismail, Ali Galalah Mostafa
Ayonrinde, Oyekoya Taiwo
author_sort Lall, Vidit
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly diagnosed in individuals aged < 50 years, resulting in advocacy of screening from age 45 years. Despite existing knowledge associating CRC with conventional adenomas, the significance of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) on the burden of CRC is less detailed. We aimed to provide contemporary estimates for SSL prevalence and examine patient and procedure factors associated with SSL detection. METHODS: Retrospective observational study examining associations between SSL and conventional adenoma detection, polyp histopathology, patient, and procedure characteristics in an outpatient colonoscopy unit over 12 months. RESULTS: From 2097 colonoscopies, SSL detection was 13.8% overall and 12.5% in patients < 50 years. SSLs were mostly proximal in location (64%), and SSL detection was significantly higher in females compared with males (16.2% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.003), particularly in those < 50 years (16.8% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, SSL detection was associated with female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.91), synchronous conventional adenoma detection (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04–1.78) and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02–1.77). Conventional adenoma detection was 33.6% and associated with age ≥ 50 years (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 2.84–4.47) and synchronous SSL detection (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03–1.79). CONCLUSIONS: We observed age and sex disparities in polyp types and prevalence in this outpatient colonoscopy population. SSLs were most prevalent in females aged < 50 years, suggesting a potential increased susceptibility of young females to SSLs and CRC. Our findings may have implications for the design of CRC screening programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9262786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92627862022-07-09 Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening? Lall, Vidit Ismail, Ali Galalah Mostafa Ayonrinde, Oyekoya Taiwo Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly diagnosed in individuals aged < 50 years, resulting in advocacy of screening from age 45 years. Despite existing knowledge associating CRC with conventional adenomas, the significance of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) on the burden of CRC is less detailed. We aimed to provide contemporary estimates for SSL prevalence and examine patient and procedure factors associated with SSL detection. METHODS: Retrospective observational study examining associations between SSL and conventional adenoma detection, polyp histopathology, patient, and procedure characteristics in an outpatient colonoscopy unit over 12 months. RESULTS: From 2097 colonoscopies, SSL detection was 13.8% overall and 12.5% in patients < 50 years. SSLs were mostly proximal in location (64%), and SSL detection was significantly higher in females compared with males (16.2% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.003), particularly in those < 50 years (16.8% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, SSL detection was associated with female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.91), synchronous conventional adenoma detection (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04–1.78) and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02–1.77). Conventional adenoma detection was 33.6% and associated with age ≥ 50 years (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 2.84–4.47) and synchronous SSL detection (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03–1.79). CONCLUSIONS: We observed age and sex disparities in polyp types and prevalence in this outpatient colonoscopy population. SSLs were most prevalent in females aged < 50 years, suggesting a potential increased susceptibility of young females to SSLs and CRC. Our findings may have implications for the design of CRC screening programs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9262786/ /pubmed/35660947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04191-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lall, Vidit
Ismail, Ali Galalah Mostafa
Ayonrinde, Oyekoya Taiwo
Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
title Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
title_full Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
title_fullStr Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
title_full_unstemmed Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
title_short Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
title_sort disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population–implications for colorectal cancer screening?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35660947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04191-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lallvidit disparateageandsexdistributionofsessileserratedlesionsandconventionaladenomasinanoutpatientcolonoscopypopulationimplicationsforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT ismailaligalalahmostafa disparateageandsexdistributionofsessileserratedlesionsandconventionaladenomasinanoutpatientcolonoscopypopulationimplicationsforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT ayonrindeoyekoyataiwo disparateageandsexdistributionofsessileserratedlesionsandconventionaladenomasinanoutpatientcolonoscopypopulationimplicationsforcolorectalcancerscreening