Cargando…

Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND: Volume expansion and vasopressors for the treatment of shock is an intensive process that requires frequent assessments and adjustments. Strict blood pressure goals in multiple physiologic states of shock (traumatic brain injury, sepsis, and hemorrhagic) have been associated with improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Nathan T. P., Goenaga-Diaz, Eduardo J., Lane, Magan R., Austin Johnson, M., Neff, Lucas P., Williams, Timothy K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00459-2
_version_ 1784742631510638592
author Patel, Nathan T. P.
Goenaga-Diaz, Eduardo J.
Lane, Magan R.
Austin Johnson, M.
Neff, Lucas P.
Williams, Timothy K.
author_facet Patel, Nathan T. P.
Goenaga-Diaz, Eduardo J.
Lane, Magan R.
Austin Johnson, M.
Neff, Lucas P.
Williams, Timothy K.
author_sort Patel, Nathan T. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Volume expansion and vasopressors for the treatment of shock is an intensive process that requires frequent assessments and adjustments. Strict blood pressure goals in multiple physiologic states of shock (traumatic brain injury, sepsis, and hemorrhagic) have been associated with improved outcomes. The availability of continuous physiologic data is amenable to closed-loop automated critical care to improve goal-directed resuscitation. METHODS: Five adult swine were anesthetized and subjected to a controlled 30% estimated total blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 min of complete supra-celiac aortic occlusion and then autotransfusion back to euvolemia with removal of aortic balloon. The animals underwent closed-loop critical care for 255 min after removal of the endovascular aortic balloon. The closed-loop critical care algorithm used proximal aortic pressure and central venous pressure as physiologic input data. The algorithm had the option to provide programmatic control of pumps for titration of vasopressors and weight-based crystalloid boluses (5 ml/kg) to maintain a mean arterial pressure between 60 and 70 mmHg. RESULTS: During the 255 min of critical care the animals experienced hypotension (< 60 mmHg) 15.3% (interquartile range: 8.6–16.9%), hypertension (> 70 mmHg) 7.7% (interquartile range: 6.7–9.4%), and normotension (60–70 mmHg) 76.9% (interquartile range: 76.5–81.2%) of the time. Excluding the first 60 min of the critical care phase the animals experienced hypotension 1.0% (interquartile range: 0.5–6.7%) of the time. Median intervention rate was 8.47 interventions per hour (interquartile range: 7.8–9.2 interventions per hour). The proportion of interventions was 61.5% (interquartile range: 61.1–66.7%) weight-based crystalloid boluses and 38.5% (interquartile range: 33.3–38.9%) titration of vasopressors. CONCLUSION: This autonomous critical care platform uses critical care adjuncts in an ischemia–reperfusion injury model, utilizing goal-directed closed-loop critical care algorithm and device actuation. This description highlights the potential for this approach to deliver nuanced critical care in the ICU environment, thereby optimizing resuscitative efforts and expanding capabilities through cognitive offloading. Future efforts will focus on optimizing this platform through comparative studies of inputs, therapies, and comparison to manual critical care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-022-00459-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9263023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92630232022-07-09 Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury Patel, Nathan T. P. Goenaga-Diaz, Eduardo J. Lane, Magan R. Austin Johnson, M. Neff, Lucas P. Williams, Timothy K. Intensive Care Med Exp Methodologies BACKGROUND: Volume expansion and vasopressors for the treatment of shock is an intensive process that requires frequent assessments and adjustments. Strict blood pressure goals in multiple physiologic states of shock (traumatic brain injury, sepsis, and hemorrhagic) have been associated with improved outcomes. The availability of continuous physiologic data is amenable to closed-loop automated critical care to improve goal-directed resuscitation. METHODS: Five adult swine were anesthetized and subjected to a controlled 30% estimated total blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 min of complete supra-celiac aortic occlusion and then autotransfusion back to euvolemia with removal of aortic balloon. The animals underwent closed-loop critical care for 255 min after removal of the endovascular aortic balloon. The closed-loop critical care algorithm used proximal aortic pressure and central venous pressure as physiologic input data. The algorithm had the option to provide programmatic control of pumps for titration of vasopressors and weight-based crystalloid boluses (5 ml/kg) to maintain a mean arterial pressure between 60 and 70 mmHg. RESULTS: During the 255 min of critical care the animals experienced hypotension (< 60 mmHg) 15.3% (interquartile range: 8.6–16.9%), hypertension (> 70 mmHg) 7.7% (interquartile range: 6.7–9.4%), and normotension (60–70 mmHg) 76.9% (interquartile range: 76.5–81.2%) of the time. Excluding the first 60 min of the critical care phase the animals experienced hypotension 1.0% (interquartile range: 0.5–6.7%) of the time. Median intervention rate was 8.47 interventions per hour (interquartile range: 7.8–9.2 interventions per hour). The proportion of interventions was 61.5% (interquartile range: 61.1–66.7%) weight-based crystalloid boluses and 38.5% (interquartile range: 33.3–38.9%) titration of vasopressors. CONCLUSION: This autonomous critical care platform uses critical care adjuncts in an ischemia–reperfusion injury model, utilizing goal-directed closed-loop critical care algorithm and device actuation. This description highlights the potential for this approach to deliver nuanced critical care in the ICU environment, thereby optimizing resuscitative efforts and expanding capabilities through cognitive offloading. Future efforts will focus on optimizing this platform through comparative studies of inputs, therapies, and comparison to manual critical care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-022-00459-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9263023/ /pubmed/35799034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00459-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Methodologies
Patel, Nathan T. P.
Goenaga-Diaz, Eduardo J.
Lane, Magan R.
Austin Johnson, M.
Neff, Lucas P.
Williams, Timothy K.
Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
title Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
title_full Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
title_fullStr Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
title_full_unstemmed Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
title_short Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
title_sort closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia–reperfusion injury
topic Methodologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00459-2
work_keys_str_mv AT patelnathantp closedloopautomatedcriticalcareasproofofconceptstudyforresuscitationinaswinemodelofischemiareperfusioninjury
AT goenagadiazeduardoj closedloopautomatedcriticalcareasproofofconceptstudyforresuscitationinaswinemodelofischemiareperfusioninjury
AT lanemaganr closedloopautomatedcriticalcareasproofofconceptstudyforresuscitationinaswinemodelofischemiareperfusioninjury
AT austinjohnsonm closedloopautomatedcriticalcareasproofofconceptstudyforresuscitationinaswinemodelofischemiareperfusioninjury
AT nefflucasp closedloopautomatedcriticalcareasproofofconceptstudyforresuscitationinaswinemodelofischemiareperfusioninjury
AT williamstimothyk closedloopautomatedcriticalcareasproofofconceptstudyforresuscitationinaswinemodelofischemiareperfusioninjury