Cargando…

Predicting Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Gene Mutation Status in Patients With Colorectal Cancer by Radiomics Models Based on Multiphasic CT

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate radiomics models based on multiphasic CT in predicting Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) gene mutation status in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 231 patients with pathologically confirmed CRC were retrospectively enrolled and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Jianfeng, Xia, Xiaoying, Wang, Peng, Peng, Yu, Liu, Jieqiong, Xie, Xiaobin, Liao, Yuting, Wan, Qi, Li, Xinchun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814386
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.848798
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate radiomics models based on multiphasic CT in predicting Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) gene mutation status in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 231 patients with pathologically confirmed CRC were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into training(n=184) and test groups(n=47) in a ratio of 4:1. A total of 1316 quantitative radiomics features were extracted from non-contrast phase (NCP), arterial-phase (AP) and venous-phase (VP) CT for each patient. Four steps were applied for feature selection including Spearman correlation analysis, variance threshold, least absolute contraction and selection operator, and multivariate stepwise regression analysis. Clinical and pathological characteristics were also assessed. Subsequently, three classification methods, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and random tree (RT) algorithm, were applied to develop seven groups of prediction models (NCP, AP, VP, AP+VP, AP+VP+NCP, AP&VP, AP&VP&NCP) for KRAS mutation prediction. The performance of these models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Among the three groups of single-phase models, the AP model, developed by LR algorithm, showed the best prediction performance with an AUC value of 0.811 (95% CI:0.685–0.938) in the test cohort. Compared with the single-phase models, the dual-phase (AP+VP) model with the LR algorithm showed better prediction performance (AUC=0.826, 95% CI:0.700-0.952). The performance of multiphasic (AP+VP+NCP) model with the LR algorithm (AUC=0.811, 95%CI: 0.679-0.944) is comparable to the model with the SVM algorithm (AUC=0.811, 95%CI: 0.695-0.918) in the test cohort, but the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the multiphasic (AP+VP+NCP) model with the LR algorithm were 0.810, 0.808, 0.809 respectively, which were highest among these seven groups of prediction models in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: The CT radiomics models have the potential to predict KRAS mutation in patients with CRC; different phases may affect the predictive efficacy of radiomics model, of which arterial-phase CT is more informative. The combination of multiphasic CT images can further improve the performance of radiomics model.