Cargando…

The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study

BACKGROUND: In March 2020 lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic forced Polish Medical Universities to implement e-learning. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perception of e-learning by students of Medical Universities in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survey was performed nationwide via the I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyrek, Nicola, Wikarek, Agnieszka, Niemiec, Małgorzata, Owczarek, Aleksander J., Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, Magdalena, Kocełak, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03600-7
_version_ 1784742735753773056
author Dyrek, Nicola
Wikarek, Agnieszka
Niemiec, Małgorzata
Owczarek, Aleksander J.
Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, Magdalena
Kocełak, Piotr
author_facet Dyrek, Nicola
Wikarek, Agnieszka
Niemiec, Małgorzata
Owczarek, Aleksander J.
Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, Magdalena
Kocełak, Piotr
author_sort Dyrek, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In March 2020 lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic forced Polish Medical Universities to implement e-learning. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perception of e-learning by students of Medical Universities in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survey was performed nationwide via the Internet from 30th November 2020 to 10th February 2021. Six hundred fifteen (615) medical students completed the survey. The study questionnaire included questions concerning sociodemographic data, perception of lecturers’ effectiveness, assessment of stationary and online classes, changes in learning habits and restrictions on education, and advantages and disadvantages of e-learning. RESULTS: The respondents reported that 96.1% of lectures, 85.5% of seminars, and 40.0% of clinical classes were implemented by e-learning. The lectures conducted by e-learning were assessed as good and very good by 78.4% and seminars by 51.2% of respondents. While the clinical classes conducted by e-learning were assessed as bad and very bad by 62.9% of respondents. The most frequently indicated limitations of e-learning were the quality of the content and available materials (26.9%), restrictions in direct contact with the lecturer (19.6%), Internet connection (16.8%), and home conditions (13.8%). Only 4% of the students had to buy or retrofit computer equipment. Any other limitations were indicated by 9.7% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Students were highly accepting of lectures and seminars conducted in the form of e-learning, but not laboratory and clinical classes. The main problems in e-learning are the quality of the classes conducted and the Internet connection. The students expect e-learning classes to be conducted in real-time, with direct, face-to-face contact with the lecturer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9263431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92634312022-07-08 The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study Dyrek, Nicola Wikarek, Agnieszka Niemiec, Małgorzata Owczarek, Aleksander J. Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, Magdalena Kocełak, Piotr BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: In March 2020 lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic forced Polish Medical Universities to implement e-learning. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perception of e-learning by students of Medical Universities in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survey was performed nationwide via the Internet from 30th November 2020 to 10th February 2021. Six hundred fifteen (615) medical students completed the survey. The study questionnaire included questions concerning sociodemographic data, perception of lecturers’ effectiveness, assessment of stationary and online classes, changes in learning habits and restrictions on education, and advantages and disadvantages of e-learning. RESULTS: The respondents reported that 96.1% of lectures, 85.5% of seminars, and 40.0% of clinical classes were implemented by e-learning. The lectures conducted by e-learning were assessed as good and very good by 78.4% and seminars by 51.2% of respondents. While the clinical classes conducted by e-learning were assessed as bad and very bad by 62.9% of respondents. The most frequently indicated limitations of e-learning were the quality of the content and available materials (26.9%), restrictions in direct contact with the lecturer (19.6%), Internet connection (16.8%), and home conditions (13.8%). Only 4% of the students had to buy or retrofit computer equipment. Any other limitations were indicated by 9.7% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Students were highly accepting of lectures and seminars conducted in the form of e-learning, but not laboratory and clinical classes. The main problems in e-learning are the quality of the classes conducted and the Internet connection. The students expect e-learning classes to be conducted in real-time, with direct, face-to-face contact with the lecturer. BioMed Central 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9263431/ /pubmed/35804369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03600-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dyrek, Nicola
Wikarek, Agnieszka
Niemiec, Małgorzata
Owczarek, Aleksander J.
Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, Magdalena
Kocełak, Piotr
The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study
title The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study
title_full The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study
title_fullStr The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study
title_full_unstemmed The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study
title_short The perception of e-learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in Poland – a survey-based study
title_sort perception of e-learning during the sars-cov-2 pandemic by students of medical universities in poland – a survey-based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03600-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dyreknicola theperceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT wikarekagnieszka theperceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT niemiecmałgorzata theperceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT owczarekaleksanderj theperceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT olszaneckaglinianowiczmagdalena theperceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT kocełakpiotr theperceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT dyreknicola perceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT wikarekagnieszka perceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT niemiecmałgorzata perceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT owczarekaleksanderj perceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT olszaneckaglinianowiczmagdalena perceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy
AT kocełakpiotr perceptionofelearningduringthesarscov2pandemicbystudentsofmedicaluniversitiesinpolandasurveybasedstudy