Cargando…

Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations

BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, routine antenatal care was disrupted, and pregnant women positive for COVID-19 were at increased risk of caesarean section, intensive care admission or neonatal unit admission for their baby. Virtual care and telehealth can reduce barriers to ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bircher, Charles, Wilkes, Matt, Zahradka, Nicole, Wells, Emily, Prosser-Snelling, Ed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04863-0
_version_ 1784742826239590400
author Bircher, Charles
Wilkes, Matt
Zahradka, Nicole
Wells, Emily
Prosser-Snelling, Ed
author_facet Bircher, Charles
Wilkes, Matt
Zahradka, Nicole
Wells, Emily
Prosser-Snelling, Ed
author_sort Bircher, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, routine antenatal care was disrupted, and pregnant women positive for COVID-19 were at increased risk of caesarean section, intensive care admission or neonatal unit admission for their baby. Virtual care and telehealth can reduce barriers to care and improve maternity outcomes, and adoption has been encouraged by health authorities in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Trust deployed a flexible maternity virtual ward (MVW) service using the Current Health platform to care for pregnant women during the pandemic. Patients were monitored either intermittently with finger pulse oximetry or continuously with a wearable device. We outline the MVW technology, intervention and staffing model, triage criteria and patient feedback, as an example of an operational model for other institutions. RESULTS: Between October 2021 and February 2022, 429 patients were referred, of which 228 were admitted to the MVW. Total bed-days was 1,182, mean length of stay was 6 days (SD 2.3, range 1–14 days). Fifteen (6.6%) required hospital admission and one (0.4%) critical care. There were no deaths. Feedback alluded to feelings of increased safety, comfort, and ease with the technology. CONCLUSIONS: The MVW offered a safety net to pregnant women positive for COVID-19. It provided reassurance for staff, while relieving pressures on infrastructure. When setting up similar services in future, attention should be given to identifying clinical champions, triage criteria, technology and alarm selection, and establishing flexible escalation pathways that can adapt to changing patterns of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9263797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92637972022-07-08 Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations Bircher, Charles Wilkes, Matt Zahradka, Nicole Wells, Emily Prosser-Snelling, Ed BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, routine antenatal care was disrupted, and pregnant women positive for COVID-19 were at increased risk of caesarean section, intensive care admission or neonatal unit admission for their baby. Virtual care and telehealth can reduce barriers to care and improve maternity outcomes, and adoption has been encouraged by health authorities in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Trust deployed a flexible maternity virtual ward (MVW) service using the Current Health platform to care for pregnant women during the pandemic. Patients were monitored either intermittently with finger pulse oximetry or continuously with a wearable device. We outline the MVW technology, intervention and staffing model, triage criteria and patient feedback, as an example of an operational model for other institutions. RESULTS: Between October 2021 and February 2022, 429 patients were referred, of which 228 were admitted to the MVW. Total bed-days was 1,182, mean length of stay was 6 days (SD 2.3, range 1–14 days). Fifteen (6.6%) required hospital admission and one (0.4%) critical care. There were no deaths. Feedback alluded to feelings of increased safety, comfort, and ease with the technology. CONCLUSIONS: The MVW offered a safety net to pregnant women positive for COVID-19. It provided reassurance for staff, while relieving pressures on infrastructure. When setting up similar services in future, attention should be given to identifying clinical champions, triage criteria, technology and alarm selection, and establishing flexible escalation pathways that can adapt to changing patterns of disease. BioMed Central 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9263797/ /pubmed/35804304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04863-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bircher, Charles
Wilkes, Matt
Zahradka, Nicole
Wells, Emily
Prosser-Snelling, Ed
Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations
title Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations
title_full Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations
title_fullStr Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations
title_full_unstemmed Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations
title_short Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations
title_sort remote care and triage of obstetric patients with covid-19 in the community: operational considerations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04863-0
work_keys_str_mv AT birchercharles remotecareandtriageofobstetricpatientswithcovid19inthecommunityoperationalconsiderations
AT wilkesmatt remotecareandtriageofobstetricpatientswithcovid19inthecommunityoperationalconsiderations
AT zahradkanicole remotecareandtriageofobstetricpatientswithcovid19inthecommunityoperationalconsiderations
AT wellsemily remotecareandtriageofobstetricpatientswithcovid19inthecommunityoperationalconsiderations
AT prossersnellinged remotecareandtriageofobstetricpatientswithcovid19inthecommunityoperationalconsiderations