Cargando…

Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion

Remote sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and structure from motion (SfM) is useful for the sustainable and cost-effective management of agricultural fields. Ground control points (GCPs) are typically used for the high-precision monitoring of plant height (PH). Additionally, a secondary U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujiwara, Ryo, Kikawada, Tomohiro, Sato, Hisashi, Akiyama, Yukio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.886804
_version_ 1784742855624884224
author Fujiwara, Ryo
Kikawada, Tomohiro
Sato, Hisashi
Akiyama, Yukio
author_facet Fujiwara, Ryo
Kikawada, Tomohiro
Sato, Hisashi
Akiyama, Yukio
author_sort Fujiwara, Ryo
collection PubMed
description Remote sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and structure from motion (SfM) is useful for the sustainable and cost-effective management of agricultural fields. Ground control points (GCPs) are typically used for the high-precision monitoring of plant height (PH). Additionally, a secondary UAV flight is necessary when off-season images are processed to obtain the ground altitude (GA). In this study, four variables, namely, camera angles, real-time kinematic (RTK), GCPs, and methods for GA, were compared with the predictive performance of maize PH. Linear regression models for PH prediction were validated using training data from different targets on different flights (“different-targets-and-different-flight” cross-validation). PH prediction using UAV-SfM at a camera angle of –60° with RTK, GCPs, and GA obtained from an off-season flight scored a high coefficient of determination and a low mean absolute error (MAE) for validation data (R(2)(val) = 0.766, MAE = 0.039 m in the vegetative stage; R(2)(val) = 0.803, MAE = 0.063 m in the reproductive stage). The low-cost case (LC) method, conducted at a camera angle of –60° without RTK, GCPs, or an extra off-season flight, achieved comparable predictive performance (R(2)(val) = 0.794, MAE = 0.036 m in the vegetative stage; R(2)(val) = 0.749, MAE = 0.072 m in the reproductive stage), suggesting that this method can achieve low-cost and high-precision PH monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9263916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92639162022-07-09 Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion Fujiwara, Ryo Kikawada, Tomohiro Sato, Hisashi Akiyama, Yukio Front Plant Sci Plant Science Remote sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and structure from motion (SfM) is useful for the sustainable and cost-effective management of agricultural fields. Ground control points (GCPs) are typically used for the high-precision monitoring of plant height (PH). Additionally, a secondary UAV flight is necessary when off-season images are processed to obtain the ground altitude (GA). In this study, four variables, namely, camera angles, real-time kinematic (RTK), GCPs, and methods for GA, were compared with the predictive performance of maize PH. Linear regression models for PH prediction were validated using training data from different targets on different flights (“different-targets-and-different-flight” cross-validation). PH prediction using UAV-SfM at a camera angle of –60° with RTK, GCPs, and GA obtained from an off-season flight scored a high coefficient of determination and a low mean absolute error (MAE) for validation data (R(2)(val) = 0.766, MAE = 0.039 m in the vegetative stage; R(2)(val) = 0.803, MAE = 0.063 m in the reproductive stage). The low-cost case (LC) method, conducted at a camera angle of –60° without RTK, GCPs, or an extra off-season flight, achieved comparable predictive performance (R(2)(val) = 0.794, MAE = 0.036 m in the vegetative stage; R(2)(val) = 0.749, MAE = 0.072 m in the reproductive stage), suggesting that this method can achieve low-cost and high-precision PH monitoring. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9263916/ /pubmed/35812919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.886804 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fujiwara, Kikawada, Sato and Akiyama. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Fujiwara, Ryo
Kikawada, Tomohiro
Sato, Hisashi
Akiyama, Yukio
Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion
title Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion
title_full Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion
title_fullStr Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion
title_short Comparison of Remote Sensing Methods for Plant Heights in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Structure From Motion
title_sort comparison of remote sensing methods for plant heights in agricultural fields using unmanned aerial vehicle-based structure from motion
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35812919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.886804
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiwararyo comparisonofremotesensingmethodsforplantheightsinagriculturalfieldsusingunmannedaerialvehiclebasedstructurefrommotion
AT kikawadatomohiro comparisonofremotesensingmethodsforplantheightsinagriculturalfieldsusingunmannedaerialvehiclebasedstructurefrommotion
AT satohisashi comparisonofremotesensingmethodsforplantheightsinagriculturalfieldsusingunmannedaerialvehiclebasedstructurefrommotion
AT akiyamayukio comparisonofremotesensingmethodsforplantheightsinagriculturalfieldsusingunmannedaerialvehiclebasedstructurefrommotion