Cargando…

Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study

BACKGROUND: Developing a safety culture in hospitals improves patient safety-related initiatives. Limited recent knowledge about patient safety culture (PSC) exists in the healthcare context. AIMS: This study assessed nurses’ reporting on the predictors and outcomes of PSC and the differences betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mrayyan, Majd T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35798501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001889
_version_ 1784742861336477696
author Mrayyan, Majd T
author_facet Mrayyan, Majd T
author_sort Mrayyan, Majd T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developing a safety culture in hospitals improves patient safety-related initiatives. Limited recent knowledge about patient safety culture (PSC) exists in the healthcare context. AIMS: This study assessed nurses’ reporting on the predictors and outcomes of PSC and the differences between the patient safety grades and the number of events reported across the components of PSC. METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative research design was conducted. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists) guided the study. The researcher recruited a convenience sample of 300 registered nurses using the hospital survey on patient safety culture, with a response rate of 75%. RESULTS: Nurses reported PSC to be ‘moderate’. Areas of strength in PSC were non-punitive responses to errors and teamwork within units. Areas that needed improvements were the supervisor’s/manager’s expectations and actions in promoting safety and communication openness. Some significant correlations were reported among PSC components. Significant differences in means were observed for patient safety grades in six out of the ten PSC components and one outcome item. Organisational learning/continuous improvement, hospital handoffs and transitions, years of experience in the current hospital, the supervisor’s/manager’s expectations and actions in promoting safety and gender predicted PSC. Of the outcomes, around half of the sample reported a ‘very good’ patient safety grade, and ‘no events’ or ‘one to two events’ only were reported, and nurses ‘agreed’ on the majority of items, which indicates a positive perception about the overall PSC in the hospitals. In addition, nurses ‘most of the time’ reported the events when they occurred. PSC components correlated significantly and moderately with PSC outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: PSC was moderate with an overall positive nurses’ perceptions. PSC’s strengths should be maintained, and areas of improvement should be prioritised and immediately tackled. Assessing PSC is the first step in improving hospitals’ overall performance and quality of services, and improving patient safety practices is essential to improving PSC and clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9263941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92639412022-07-25 Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study Mrayyan, Majd T BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Developing a safety culture in hospitals improves patient safety-related initiatives. Limited recent knowledge about patient safety culture (PSC) exists in the healthcare context. AIMS: This study assessed nurses’ reporting on the predictors and outcomes of PSC and the differences between the patient safety grades and the number of events reported across the components of PSC. METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative research design was conducted. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists) guided the study. The researcher recruited a convenience sample of 300 registered nurses using the hospital survey on patient safety culture, with a response rate of 75%. RESULTS: Nurses reported PSC to be ‘moderate’. Areas of strength in PSC were non-punitive responses to errors and teamwork within units. Areas that needed improvements were the supervisor’s/manager’s expectations and actions in promoting safety and communication openness. Some significant correlations were reported among PSC components. Significant differences in means were observed for patient safety grades in six out of the ten PSC components and one outcome item. Organisational learning/continuous improvement, hospital handoffs and transitions, years of experience in the current hospital, the supervisor’s/manager’s expectations and actions in promoting safety and gender predicted PSC. Of the outcomes, around half of the sample reported a ‘very good’ patient safety grade, and ‘no events’ or ‘one to two events’ only were reported, and nurses ‘agreed’ on the majority of items, which indicates a positive perception about the overall PSC in the hospitals. In addition, nurses ‘most of the time’ reported the events when they occurred. PSC components correlated significantly and moderately with PSC outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: PSC was moderate with an overall positive nurses’ perceptions. PSC’s strengths should be maintained, and areas of improvement should be prioritised and immediately tackled. Assessing PSC is the first step in improving hospitals’ overall performance and quality of services, and improving patient safety practices is essential to improving PSC and clinical outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9263941/ /pubmed/35798501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001889 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Mrayyan, Majd T
Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
title Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
title_full Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
title_fullStr Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
title_short Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
title_sort predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture: a cross-sectional comparative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35798501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001889
work_keys_str_mv AT mrayyanmajdt predictorsandoutcomesofpatientsafetycultureacrosssectionalcomparativestudy