Cargando…

Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead

Despite advances, cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains fundamentally orientated to the dyssynchrony of left bundle branch block (LBBB), in which septo-lateral electrical and mechanical delays predominate. For non-LBBB patients response rates to conventional CRT are lower and mortality and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Malcolm J., Sparks, Paul B., Capitani, Giada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.04.002
_version_ 1784742879997984768
author Dennis, Malcolm J.
Sparks, Paul B.
Capitani, Giada
author_facet Dennis, Malcolm J.
Sparks, Paul B.
Capitani, Giada
author_sort Dennis, Malcolm J.
collection PubMed
description Despite advances, cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains fundamentally orientated to the dyssynchrony of left bundle branch block (LBBB), in which septo-lateral electrical and mechanical delays predominate. For non-LBBB patients response rates to conventional CRT are lower and mortality and rehospitalisation rates are not reduced. Despite this, alternative approaches which tailor CRT to the differing dyssynchrony patterns of non-LBBB have yet to be developed. In the specific non-LBBB subgroup of right bundle branch block (RBBB) with left posterior fascicular block (LPFB), ventricular conduction via the left anterior fascicle results in a unique early lateral, and late septal depolarisation, or lateral to septal left ventricular (LV) delay, an electrical sequence which is followed mechanically. This latero-septal delay is somewhat the reverse of LBBB and was overcome by fusing right ventricular (RV) septal pacing with intrinsic conduction via the left anterior fascicle, achieving successful resynchronisation without implantation of a left ventricular lead. A stable fusion pattern was achieved via the ‘Negative AV Hysteresis with Search’ algorithm (Abbott, St Paul, Minnesota). Improvement in all standard CRT response indices was achieved at 3 months: QRS duration was reduced from 153 to 106 ms, ejection fraction increased from 14 to 32%, and LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters reduced by 19% and 12.5% respectively. NYHA class improved from III-IV to class II. Cardiac resynchronisation for RBBB with LPFB can be successfully achieved with a standard pacemaker or defibrillator without left ventricular lead implantation by fusing RV septal-only pacing with intrinsic conduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9264020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92640202022-07-09 Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead Dennis, Malcolm J. Sparks, Paul B. Capitani, Giada Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Case Report Despite advances, cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains fundamentally orientated to the dyssynchrony of left bundle branch block (LBBB), in which septo-lateral electrical and mechanical delays predominate. For non-LBBB patients response rates to conventional CRT are lower and mortality and rehospitalisation rates are not reduced. Despite this, alternative approaches which tailor CRT to the differing dyssynchrony patterns of non-LBBB have yet to be developed. In the specific non-LBBB subgroup of right bundle branch block (RBBB) with left posterior fascicular block (LPFB), ventricular conduction via the left anterior fascicle results in a unique early lateral, and late septal depolarisation, or lateral to septal left ventricular (LV) delay, an electrical sequence which is followed mechanically. This latero-septal delay is somewhat the reverse of LBBB and was overcome by fusing right ventricular (RV) septal pacing with intrinsic conduction via the left anterior fascicle, achieving successful resynchronisation without implantation of a left ventricular lead. A stable fusion pattern was achieved via the ‘Negative AV Hysteresis with Search’ algorithm (Abbott, St Paul, Minnesota). Improvement in all standard CRT response indices was achieved at 3 months: QRS duration was reduced from 153 to 106 ms, ejection fraction increased from 14 to 32%, and LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters reduced by 19% and 12.5% respectively. NYHA class improved from III-IV to class II. Cardiac resynchronisation for RBBB with LPFB can be successfully achieved with a standard pacemaker or defibrillator without left ventricular lead implantation by fusing RV septal-only pacing with intrinsic conduction. Elsevier 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9264020/ /pubmed/35427783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.04.002 Text en © 2022 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Dennis, Malcolm J.
Sparks, Paul B.
Capitani, Giada
Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
title Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
title_full Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
title_fullStr Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
title_full_unstemmed Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
title_short Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
title_sort tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2022.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT dennismalcolmj tailoringcardiacresynchronisationtherapytononleftbundlebranchblocksuccessfulcardiacresynchronisationforrightbundlebranchblockwithleftposteriorfascicularblockwithoutimplantationofaleftventricularlead
AT sparkspaulb tailoringcardiacresynchronisationtherapytononleftbundlebranchblocksuccessfulcardiacresynchronisationforrightbundlebranchblockwithleftposteriorfascicularblockwithoutimplantationofaleftventricularlead
AT capitanigiada tailoringcardiacresynchronisationtherapytononleftbundlebranchblocksuccessfulcardiacresynchronisationforrightbundlebranchblockwithleftposteriorfascicularblockwithoutimplantationofaleftventricularlead