Cargando…

Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, Casey, Alfille, Paul, Mountjoy, Jeremi, Bao, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813725
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1740
_version_ 1784742895251619840
author Hamilton, Casey
Alfille, Paul
Mountjoy, Jeremi
Bao, Xiaodong
author_facet Hamilton, Casey
Alfille, Paul
Mountjoy, Jeremi
Bao, Xiaodong
author_sort Hamilton, Casey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms “thoracic surgery”, “thoracic surgery AND pain management”, “thoracic surgery AND analgesia”, “thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia”, “thoracic surgery AND epidural”. We considered articles written in English and available to the reader. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: There is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9264080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92640802022-07-09 Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review Hamilton, Casey Alfille, Paul Mountjoy, Jeremi Bao, Xiaodong J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms “thoracic surgery”, “thoracic surgery AND pain management”, “thoracic surgery AND analgesia”, “thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia”, “thoracic surgery AND epidural”. We considered articles written in English and available to the reader. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: There is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9264080/ /pubmed/35813725 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1740 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Hamilton, Casey
Alfille, Paul
Mountjoy, Jeremi
Bao, Xiaodong
Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
title Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
title_full Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
title_fullStr Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
title_short Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
title_sort regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813725
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1740
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltoncasey regionalanesthesiaandacuteperioperativepainmanagementinthoracicsurgeryanarrativereview
AT alfillepaul regionalanesthesiaandacuteperioperativepainmanagementinthoracicsurgeryanarrativereview
AT mountjoyjeremi regionalanesthesiaandacuteperioperativepainmanagementinthoracicsurgeryanarrativereview
AT baoxiaodong regionalanesthesiaandacuteperioperativepainmanagementinthoracicsurgeryanarrativereview